Thanks for raising this; as @satojandro mentioned, we are experimenting with public and limited work groups to determine the best way to have contributors working toward objective outcomes.
As you may have observed, several public work groups ended with infighting or stalled, now known as “default dead,” contributed by AVB.
When these groups are rebooted or new groups are spun up, we have been testing inviting members initially that have expressed either direct interest or shown the most significant contribution to NDC, or that are known as an expert in that area. This allows the workgroups to discover a cadence and synergy to gain clarity and alignment.
It does not mean the groups are not transparent or will not be public at some point. However, in all cases, the outcomes will be available for the Community to comment on and, in some cases, provide more feedback via polling.
We have also observed that some key contributors to workgroups have expressed their unwillingness to step forward into open workgroups due to the amount of noise and being swept into infighting and non-tangible outcomes. The new experiment allows contributors to contribute more meaningfully in many cases.
Lastly, the community is free to self-organize in publicly open workgroups or limited in how they see best to achieve objectives and outcomes to bring NDC V1 Gov online; that is the beauty of decentralization as long as they have a transparency policy and make budgets and outcomes public for community feedback.
Specifically on the OG WG, a few well-known OG’s that have been very active in NDC were asked to join the group to discuss some initial criteria like an OG form and how many OG’s need to approve an OG to receive the OG SBT. This does not mean they will pick who can serve in NDC V1 Gov directly, as the criteria are open for any Human Community member to review and comment via polling. The final members to issue OG’s will be made public with the potential for a call for more OGs to be added, in the end, the group should be well known for their contribution, not have any serious misconduct, and should be a smaller group.
The list of workgroups has been updated on NDCDocs based on this inquiry.