I suppose I am writing into a right place instead of just adding an issue to GitHub repo. Thanks for this great protocol you all develop together! For now there is an obstacle that makes interaction with fungible tokens hard. Near has a concept of storage management and special methods that makes it possible to manage funds you pay for personal on-chain data. In ft standard we have a manual storage management and to transfer your funds to someone, you shall firstly make storage deposit for his account. This behaviour is ok for using in frontend apps, but you need to ensure user has enough storage when you are trying to interact with ft contract and transfer funds. Why can’t we add a with_funding: Option<bool> to ft_transfer and ft_transfer_call