I have a question about the Criteria listed here under the category of “Decentralization”
Will the limit of Council members only being allowed to be Council on 2 DAOs still apply?
My next question is about the Legal Wrapper for DAOs.
Does anyone have experience linking Otoco LLC registered DAOs to NEAR?
Based on my experience setting one up for DAOrecords, you need to use an ETH wallet or Gnosis multi-sig, which means the Wrapper could only apply to on-chain transations on Ethereum and not NEAR. Would love more feedback on this from @creativesdao-council@marketingdao-council or anyone else with experience.
A lot of effort has clearly gone into pulling a coherent and extensive approach together in such a short time
I think the replication of the proposed NDC structure is a great move.
I remain unconvinced by the long term benefits of attracting external high profile artists into near as a leading strategy to build liquidity/interest…as the trickle down effects of this kind of strategy are often transient…but pleased to see that it sounds like existing near individual artists wil also be under consideration for the program…unless I have understood that wrong ?
“artists looking to build their web3 infrastructure on NEAR that are currently doing remarkable work”
Out of interest…will any vote to approve the proposals be for the total proposal ?..or will it be broken down into sections…so that individual parts get approved …for example the “evaluation matrix”…and the governance structure etc.
Quick question on the budget for " 50k - Creatives DAO buying NFTs of associated artists and communities - Community. Will this be managed by the DAO or is this meant for DAOs to apply for as part of their proposals to buy from other DAOs. If managed by the DAO, how would that look? Could it be a voting system via astrodao with a list of proposals to purchase NFTs, that the community could then vote on?
Since it’s a community concern i would like to contribute to what @Cryptonaut has said and also ask questions too for clarification
Looking at the post, went through the miro docs and other documents and the new process are nice and awesome, but my question is they’re still some key issue we need to sort out which I’ve not seen a documentation on it like
Voting method: The voting method in the creative should be improved, sending CFC or Astro DAO links on Creative telegram group begging or tagging people to vote for a poll is not professional.
how to improve the voting method
A Tag should be made for people/DAO’s who has voting power on creative Astro DAO so when DAO that has an approved status who has made a poll on Astro needs votes they can just make a thread post with their poll link on Astro and use the new tag that can notify the people with voting rights.
The tag can be “creative voters” just like the @creativesdao-council tag which can notify the creative mods
I have registered for LLC but haven’t tried to link it to NEAR. Since the main activity is on ETH. Btw, I believe the process is to make sure you are a legal entity to avoid any legal barrier with funding.
Since we have Astro DAO on NEAR as an alternative to manage fund, I barely use Gnosis after the registration process. I have to admit that there’s limited option for DAOs on NEAR to get Legal Wrapper, but you’re still encouraged to have your DAO legal wrapped.
The good thing is that voting on another DAO is much simpler now comparing to CFC in previous version of Astro DAO. The root cause of this is whether DAO councils are active on voting or not, so having a tag won’t help if people don’t open Astro.
Tagging people to vote won’t help, because people barely pay attention to massive tags if they are repeated time to time. I would say council removing mechanism will help, inactive councils will be removed after a period of time.
Thanks @Cryptonaut for the clarification, yep understood it was for’ infrastructure’…
… however the idea that is at the heart of the various/similar points I’ve made in the various CD threads & elsewhere on the forum/telegram groups over the last couple of months relates to your last sentence:
“Internal artist are all part of DAOs and have already built their infra.”
…So I’ve asked this question a few times:
Does an existing Near individual / non-community / non-dao-affiliated creative have to organise as a Dao to access support from Creatives Dao in order to build out even more Web3 infrastructure on near… ?
@williamx fair enough….
I like the idea of evicting inactive DAO members with voting rights also, as even with tag most DAO can still play a nonchalant role.
Hello @Cryptonaut to understand you properly communities and Ambassadors (merit) need to vote for Creative DAO NFT so as creative mods could be incharge of voting?
Did I get you right?
And am seen more of NFT’S maybe I’ve missed out the topic of creative buying NFT and stuffs can I get a recap of this idea maybe a link to follow up the topic so I understand better, thanks and big ups guys