Any aggressiveness you perceive is imaginary. I am only asking for clarification.
You said categorically that one may only be council member of two DAOs:
I asked you for the document showing the consensus of the community to back this claim up, and you provide this:
The above quote does not back up your arbitrary claim that one may be a council member of only two DAOs. Rather, it shows that renumeration for council work is restricted to 2 DAOs per individual.
There’s no documents backing your claim.
How can you even say this, @Paul ?
How is it that you’re implying that Dance DAO has similar activities with Culinary DAO, when one is about Dance and the other is about Food and Drinks. Could you, please, back up your claim that we’re merely proliferating DAOs with “similar activities”?
This brings me, inescapably, to the question:
Are you rejecting our proposals because we’re involved in multiple DAOs?
Please, pay attention to these points:
-
Near Book Club Guild has never been funded.
-
I must clarify that Near Book Club is a guild. It’s not a DAO. It’s not even on AstroDAO. This is its first funding request to CreativesDAO.
-
I am a council member in only two DAOs that actively ask funding from Creatives DAO, viz. Culinary DAO (funded once, 5 months ago) and Dance DAO (funded twice)
Nature and Tourism has never been funded.
Sports, Health and Fitness DAO has never asked for funding.
There are tons of questions on my mind about all this. I’d appreciate a conversation.
@creativesdao-council
@Paul