Name: louietism
Title: Behind those Blinds Trap the eye
Near wallet: louietism.near
Description:
the “veil of ignorance” is a moral reasoning tool intended to encourage unbiased decision-making.
By preventing decision-makers from accessing potentially biased information regarding who will profit most or least from the various option.
Its view of society and morals, as well as support for the social contract hypothesis. His perspective on justice and the guidelines that should be taken into account to guarantee that everyone has access to proper justice are discussed in detail in the book. Rawls equates justice and fairness in his book.
Name: Cengaver
Near Wallet: cengaver.near
Title: Human Thoughts
Description:
What evidence do we have that our thoughts are correct?
However, the mistake made here is that people usually focus on the inferences they make about events. If there are errors in these inferences, it should be considered that this may cause emotional problems as well.
If we want to think rationally, shouldn’t we choose a logical way of reasoning?
Shouldn’t we look at whether the ideas put forward are empirically provable?
The most important fact, which Ellis sees as the source of unhappiness that he can reveal when he collects his experiences based on these theories, is ILLEGAL THOUGHTS.
The winners here are: Boldest, Whirlpool, Jamilarts, and Eyesore. Please, wait for NEAR to send us the resources for this month and we’ll ask you to make your payout proposal.
We released a bounty for choosing the pieces of art and then we’ve chosen the arts through telegram and we confirmed it on astro. We also minted 4 NFTs (50 copies each, but 10 copies sent to the artist and 40 listed for 2.5 near) from the chosen art, with royalties and revenues splitted between the artists and the dao. Each artist received 100 usd in near.
Payout to the winners (4 members of the community receiving 100 usd in dai each):
The project was completed in the appropriate time.
Highlights and Final Products:
We could produce 4 NFTs on Mintbase, which we put for sale for 2.5 near each, with 50 copies each, in order to have products that could gives us back the spent resources. 40 listed for 2.5 near, and 10 sent to the author, with revenue and royalties split among the artist and the dao.
The project was a success. Many people participated, and some artists developed a large description talking about the thought experiment, and thus thinking about philosophy. Next month we will make that all descriptions should be considered in the voting process too. The experiment was a success and many people came to our telegram community (we have now around 90 people), but we could see that maybe we could ask for people to write about the piece too, in order for them to think more about philosophy. We have now 115 people.
