I would have to insist that my comment is correct.
By taking a quick look, at Chill&Shill and Near@Night latest proposals, linked below, anyone can clearly see that NEAR@ night mostly has around 40 total views per space, where Chill and Shill is closer to 160, with majority of spaces between 80 and 200.
Both projects request funding at around $250 per space.
Bottom line: similar funding, 2-4x difference in KPIs.
This is not to compare one project against another, but to compare KPIs within the same niche in the NEAR content space. NEAR Chill & Shill and NEAR at Night are the only projects in this niche. We support NEAR at Night and believe it’s an awesome project doing important work in the NEAR ecosystem.
I believe comparing specific KPIs across similar projects at the same price point should answer your questions.
Also, to add some more context to the conversation about KPIs, I would like to submit these screenshots with some data points that reflect similar coefficient of around 3x around written content engagement.
Reports referenced here: