Did you check our previous reports?
Why you rejected our proposal if you can approve it in a lower tier (C)?
We changed the requested amount to be in tier C.
@iamanansari @HaiVu Itās seems that you didnāt checked our previous reports so to clear any doubts that you may have, here is some points from our previous reports that will prove that we can achieve the KPIs mentioned in the proposal.
-Onboarding 65 wallets.
-30 average transactions for 40 new wallets.
In our report September we had 700 on-chain transactions and about 45 new wallets, with more funds we can easily hit our goal.
-Establishing 1-2 partnership.
We are already in contact with some communities and companies, we have more than one developer community (Web2) with whom we can conduct partnerships and events, and we also have contact with some technical colleges, we will choose a community that align with NEARās goals.
Besides, we have a good relationships with many local blockchain communities, this will help bring in new users.
-Organizing 2 online events.
We did a lot of events with a good number of attendance.
Here is a webinar with 60 attendees:
And here is one of our quiz, 390 users participated on it:
Another webinar:
-Reaching 50 active telegram members
-Reaching 25K - 35K Impressions on X.
With our strategy we can easily hit our goal in X, for Telegram we already have many active users.
- Publishing 2 article and bring 10 devs.
In September we successfully bring more than 45 devs, you can check their GitHub: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dUMl2_vMjvyRSTVZAi0NG082Gns4kiOWPZ_MeezVpz0/edit?usp=sharing
I have proven to you that we have a good previous records and a team with extensive experience. I await your decision.
1 Like
As I mentioned itās still not clear for me about partnership, you still need to establish partnership in Tier C and I donāt see any planning there. My question to you again, how will you manage this, are you the only one managing all this? Please introduce your team.
Also, we have already finalised the February Budget as of timeline given to us. We have provided you some feedbacks. Hopefully, you will work on and feel free to propose again in March with clear strategies.
Hope you understand. Thanks!
I already introduced my team yesterday and I have updated the proposal! Itās seems you didnāt check it.
Also, I wrote our plan about the partnership, itās the same plan like other proposals that you already approved!
How you already finalised the February budget? The deadline is 13th January, the time now is 14:00 UTC 13th January, we have a lot of time.
What about to delete the partnership KPIs from our proposal? Do you will approve it?
1 Like
Hi @MostafaLotfy, thanks for providing information about your team.
For the month of February you have requested a large amount for funding, to approve such an amount we need to be confident in your team.
To provide quality content and community development in NEAR, the team must have a good knowledge of the NEAR ecosystem.
Iām not sure your team knows the ecosystem well:
- gemy.near - this person last interacted with the ecosystem 8 months ago.
- nesma1.near - this person was also last active 8 months ago and has only 6 transactions.
- vica.near - this person was also last active 8 months ago and has only 5 transactions.
Also I want to notice that wallets nesma1.near and vica.near are absolutely similar to each other and look like bots, as they have the same transactions and time of creation.
Iām sorry but Iām not sure in reliability of your team and Iām not ready to support your proposal.
All team members ready to do KYC.
Also, there is no condition that the team members should be active or share their NEAR active wallets that they use to approve the proposal. All team members working under NEAR Arabic.
All team members have done a lot of works for NEAR and have a very good knowledge of the NEAR ecosystem.
BTW, I see that you approved these proposal: NEAR Vibes, NEAR Vietnam, NEAR India, NEAR ES. Without even know or ask about the team members NEAR wallets, and this is a proof that you doesnāt care about team members on-chain transactions and the most important the work that the team member will do and past work.
Hi @MostafaLotfy , tbh I really wanna have your back, and even everyone throwing in proposals here.
Look at how deep weāre vibing, doing our back-and-forths, cross-checks, and all with the other regional communities both in and out of this forum.
This aināt the end. Iām still looking forward to your funding proposal next month, bringing in something more rock-solid and comprehensive.
I donāt understand, why you canāt support us?