Hello NEAR Community,
I’m excited to open a discussion around the Conflict of Interest (COI) document I recently submitted for review. This suggestion to take the discussion to the forum came from the House of Stake telegram group
As House of Stake scales, establishing robust and transparent governance practices is essential for maintaining trust and accountability within our ecosystem.
Why This Matters:
Conflicts of interest can arise in any decentralized organization, especially as we scale participation and decision-making. A clear, actionable COI framework helps ensure that all contributors, council members, and stakeholders act in the best interests of the protocol and its community.
What’s in the Document:
- Definitions and examples of conflicts of interest relevant to NEAR governance
- Disclosure and recusal procedures for council members and contributors
- Guidelines for identifying, reporting, and managing potential conflicts
- Best practices inspired by both traditional and blockchain-native governance models
Your Input Needed:
• Are the definitions and procedures clear and practical?
• What scenarios should we include or clarify further?
• How can we ensure this framework is effective and enforceable in our specific context?
Next Steps:
I invite everyone—especially those involved in governance, grants, and council activities—to review the COI document and share your feedback, suggestions, or concerns. Your perspectives will be invaluable as we refine this framework together.
Let’s work collaboratively to strengthen NEAR’s governance standards and set a benchmark for transparency in the ecosystem. Looking forward to your thoughts and discussions - please find the document below.