You build a blockchain that uses technology to promote transparency but you run a hackathon that is the complete opposite of that.
I do not want an apology or any compensation. I am writing this for the record so others can reference in the future.
The way you ran this hackathon is nothing short of a scam. You promote a campaign to get developers to build things for prizes and when they do, nothing.
Let me mention all the red flags I’ve seen:
- Metaverse Challenge - Airtable Metaverse
- This challenge is impossible, after I spoke to gumdropsteve, the sponsor, we together saw that this was not possible to do.
NEAR doesn’t even check the viability of any of the hacks. This allows their hackathon marketing campaign to look strong when the reality half if not all are just for display.
- This challenge is impossible, after I spoke to gumdropsteve, the sponsor, we together saw that this was not possible to do.
- Chainvote challenge Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- Another challenge, where the sponsor is nowhere to be contacted. There seem to be different ways to contact each sponsor of the challenges! Eventually I found an email of their website https://www.chainvote.co/, sent a message and no response.
After more research I found out that the sponsor of this challenge is a single guy from India. https://www.linkedin.com/company/chainvote1/people/
- Another challenge, where the sponsor is nowhere to be contacted. There seem to be different ways to contact each sponsor of the challenges! Eventually I found an email of their website https://www.chainvote.co/, sent a message and no response.
- Galatic Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- Another sponsor that does not respond to email
I think a pattern is emerging here. A hyped up hackathon and non existent sponsors.
- Another sponsor that does not respond to email
- Payment Gateway Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- This sponsor straightup doesn’t have any way to contact them. Their website http://www.openguitar.org/ makes no sense and you can download the sponsor’s resume. Are you starting to feel many of these challenges are bogus? Wait there’s more!
- Metamask challenge Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- I contacted the sponsor of this challenge Hack challenge questions · Issue #2 · ilblackdragon/near-eth-gateway · GitHub and didn’t hear anything till 2 weeks later. By the time they contacted me, there was no time left to even start this.
- Marmaj challenge Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- I did this challenge but before I could submit, I found out someone else submitted. There is only 1 way to complete this challenge so I asked the sponsor about this.
They said the most efficient solution wins. Every tech person knows that answers like these are not valid and don’t make sense. Also this sponsor posted online the solution of a participant while the hackathon was ongoing [Open Challenge Payout] Marma J Foundation - MetaBUDL. How is that normal? I now feared other sponsors would do the same. You can see how disorganised this hackathon is so far.
- I did this challenge but before I could submit, I found out someone else submitted. There is only 1 way to complete this challenge so I asked the sponsor about this.
- Hype DAO Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- I complete one of the tasks separately but still part of the hackathon. I contacted the sponsor to discuss other tasks more in depth. No response
This is first when I realised this is not a organised hackathon.
- I complete one of the tasks separately but still part of the hackathon. I contacted the sponsor to discuss other tasks more in depth. No response
- Ref Finance Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- I spoke to Marco (Sponsor) and Didier (Product Manager) about this challenge.
I was already wary about submitting since I saw another participant’s solution - GitHub - Lev-Stambler/lets-swap-_- but they encouraged me and said they’ll update me along the process. I submitted, did I hear anything from them, no!
- I spoke to Marco (Sponsor) and Didier (Product Manager) about this challenge.
- Swagger Shopify Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- I spoke to FRDRK (Sponsor) on Telegram. Initially what they wanted wasn’t possible because it depended on some of their in-house solutions that weren’t ready. Why NEAR allows sponsors to host impossible challenges? Good question. I explained what I could do and he gave the green light.
I submitted and did I hear anything back, no! I think these sponsors that personally encourage you to submit solutions to their problems but don’t have decency to get back to you is just reflection of the kind of people in this ecosystem. Would you not feel this is just 1 big scam?
- I spoke to FRDRK (Sponsor) on Telegram. Initially what they wanted wasn’t possible because it depended on some of their in-house solutions that weren’t ready. Why NEAR allows sponsors to host impossible challenges? Good question. I explained what I could do and he gave the green light.
- Facebook Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- You see the name facebook and you’d think big partnership here. No don’t think that. There is no official way to contact Facebook regarding this so it is another empty bogus challenge. Accurately speaking this has nothing to do with Facebook but Diem but you wouldn’t know that. I reached out to Diem [Bug] Adapter Explanation · Issue #9095 · diem/diem · GitHub and they redirected me somewhere else. I’ve spent enough time in NEAR rabbit holes, don’t have time for Diem’s.
- MutiDao Airtable - Live Challenges for near.org/metabuidl
- This is the only sponsor that got back to me and the most complex challenge I did. I submitted this with a working video demonstration. The sponsor told me that NEAR judges couldn’t get my solution working and they don’t know what happens next. They also said that they would be happy to award me the prize but actually that decision is made by NEAR - information not made available in the beginning.
- This is the only sponsor that got back to me and the most complex challenge I did. I submitted this with a working video demonstration. The sponsor told me that NEAR judges couldn’t get my solution working and they don’t know what happens next. They also said that they would be happy to award me the prize but actually that decision is made by NEAR - information not made available in the beginning.
How would you feel?
I have just listed more than 10 of the challenges I’ve tried to participate all with questionable concerns. I spent a lot of time going through an undefined process of contacting each sponsor to learn more about their challenges. In the end I only submitted 3 challenges in spite of the many problems I faced.
I joined blockchain industry 1st August and this is the worst experience. Initially, I became interested in the hackathon because of the monetary compensation. Over time as wild wild west patterns emerged, I saw what I hoped to get out this was not even possible.
There will be no global adoption of blockchain driven by 3rd world experience, only for communities where that is normal. The many people outside blockchain that subscribe to me would not want to be part of such choreography.
The technology might be great but why would I adopt a technology made by people that like to run a bogus hackathon exploting developer time when in reality majority should not participate because they’ll get absolutely nothing leaving demoralised and spent.
If you have something to say that will prove me wrong about how this hackathon was ran, I’d be happy to be corrected because everything I’ve said is more or less accurate.
Update
I just saw on the metabuidl website that winners of the challenges I did will be announced 29th September. Information that was not said in the beginning.
Nobody knows what’s going to happen next, there isn’t a process anybody is aware yet there has been a lot of hype and already false expectations - sounds like a scam.
For people wanting to use a blockchain, usually they look at youtube videos, articles and technical papers when considering. The best determining factor is personal experience as I’m documenting.
I am completely frustrated to be part of a confusing process for a company building technology to promote the opposite. I continue to build on NEAR due to work but personally I wouldn’t use NEAR for my own app neither recommend.