Greetings from Goa! I have an administrative question regarding NEAR and its generative DAO projects.
I’m a senior web dev of over 23+ years, active in the blockchain space since 2017, and presently a co-founder of LEGACY, “preserving humanity’s history forever”, supported through the Filecoin network.
I’m also a founder and the lead producer of Goa Music Lab. Entering our third season, we’ve produced experimental music/arts TV series & hybrid events, including the 4-day live/metaverse GLOA (Goa Global Arts Festival). We are presently trialing a live arts-tech series of Robots & Animals, with plans to tour the concept through Nepal / South Asia / South East Asia in the second half of 2023. This is where we’d like to involve NEAR in our plans - even from an knowledge perspective - but also to represent at the tech conference side of things. We have a global team across multiple continents, highly diverse, etc.
The question, is that while our Robots & Animals project (and overall Lab arts-tech experiments) is very much aligned with NEAR’s mission and roadmap, a substantial part of our global plans is reliant on blockchain development. We’ve been studying digital identity, permastorage, custom tokenomics, AI/MLM assistants and semantic linkage. NEAR as a platform is intriguing through its impressive dApp and community portfolios, Aurora possibilities, and more.
How could NEAR best support an org or group, that clearly suits the CreativeDAO track, but also seeks to generate class-leading Development for decentralized administrative, distribution and event production features? Is it better to demonstrate the proof of concept in the CreativeDAO, then accelerator? Or, parallel tracks for Developer Governance?
No rush, this is a long term play. Thanks for your time and attention.
Sea