Please. Make. This. Stop.
Rhyme if you are so serious please call some lawyers and take up your LEGAL issues against ONE individual into the appropriate forum.
Seems like you are trying to set off the entire NEAR ecosystem on fire because you didn’t get your way. This is extremely unfair to everyone on the ecosystem.
Community first, always.
Such a serious thing and some words are used here.
I want to understand this clearly.
This has to do with a PROPOSAL I guess?
We get angry because our proposals are not approved and I wonder why.
This is coming from the CDAO and needs to be looked at clearly.
I am just shocked that @Dacha is dragged here.
A few questions.
Have witnessed @Dacha contribution in the ecosystem for years and he has been a person who stands for transparency and truth.
I just hope that this isn’t about getting back at someone because of past issues that have to do with proposals.
I didn’t make the post. I didn’t know this was being posted like this. Obviously my name was involved, and I spoke to what was being misrepresented, consistently. I have stayed out of most all the messes between the daos because of the toxicity. If I have spoken out, it has usually been about the same things you do. I’ve spent far more time correcting misinformation on this post than I ever planned. To suggest I’m trying to burn down the ecosysthen is a bit hyperbolic. People lied, denied lies and I adamantly corrected the lies because of adamant denials. There was nothing to get my way about. People are trying very, very hard to distort truths or deny them.
As for Issue 1
I checked the topic, @Dacha really left the inappropriate comment about @rhymetaylor and deleted it after. Also looks like some replies from Dacha were deleted as well - (can’t open them). So I guess it’s a truth that Dacha called Rhyme “a criminal”. I attached screenshots made by myself.
Personally, I think that such statements are unacceptable in this case. But the fact of removing them by the author for me means the author realized that too. Sometimes Dacha can make such statements. But he also can admit mistakes and apologize (we see the screenshot from private chat in the topic).
So my conclusion: you have some personal grievances against Dacha and you bring other working issues (like discussions about 1 MLN NFT and TC WG) to make an attack and take revenge.
That’s my independent opinion because I don’t relate with Creatives DAO or Dacha or TC WG
Thank you for doing that research on your own. In no sarcastic tone, that is appreciated. I think it’s also important to note that in this thread, the same person in question also denied the existence and validity of those same screenshots. There is no personal agenda. I also have nothing to do with the grievance of 1MLN in this post or any others. Just not into the lying. I am only speaking to what I know to be true or false, I’m good on the other stuff
Like I said, gaslighting techniques…
As the topic of the discussion is slowly getting dragged away by all the other noise.
Question still remains:
Did he or did he not manipulate and falsified comments and remarks to Rhymes post?
Did he or did he not lie about 1MILNFT?
Did he or did he not bully the creatives communities?
If y’all think that this is okay because he contributed in the ecosystem or have done something positive beforehand then you’re as “insert the word here” as he is.
Going to continue reading and see where this goes.
Hi! The problem is that:
Again take a look at point 2 and ask why this project was approved.
Assuming all your 3 question gets answered.
We’ll circle back. So… did he do it or not?
Yes, I confirm that th sceneshots with no context were taken to attack on me and false allegations.
Agree 100%. This clearly is not healthy discussion for our community which is why I’m happy to close this thread and take matters internally. I’ve just got off a call with @Dacha and I’ve already let him know to please confirm that he’s dismissing the allegations and classifying the proofs presented by the OP as fabricated as stated in my earlier comment.
Are you saying if you gave me a chance then all your wrongdoings get washed away? It’s strange that you think you gave me a chance rather than the value my proposal brought.
The reason for creation of this post is clear. You have lied about community members, called them names and you.
Attack against me. Pretty clear for everyone.
As mentioned in the comments here and here, @Dacha dismisses the allegations as false and suggests this is fabricated evidence with no context
This topic will be closed and hidden for internal review.
Beyond the specific allegations…many things can be true :
Rhyme has been a vocal critic of the extent and methodology of creatives dao funding for some time
Dacha has made a huge contribution to the ecosystem in a wide variety of ways, with a sometimes industrial workload and forensic focus
A formal dispute resolution mechanism needs to be established, where evidential cases can be brought and resolved - (Truth & Reconciliation under NDC ?)
The forum needs some work - hopefully the move to Alpha/Discovery will be the a new evolution
We need to find a way for the grassroots dao’s to live in harmony under NDC…with a methodology that the majority of the (I am Human) ecosystem can support both in principle and in reality.
onwards…
The case is about specific allegations and not beyond it.
Mistreatment and defamation has nothing to do with the work one has done for the ecosystem. One does not negate the other
NF is reviewing the case and as Dacha has called my submission fabricated, I am waiting to hear back from NF about the posts he deleted.
The post is a complaint against Dacha for calling community members criminal. Rhyme being critical about creatives funding is not a point here let alone his line of questioning.
Contributing does not mean people can be bullied and facts can be lied about.
The issue has already been raised with NF. As MDAO funding comes from NF for now. When’s process is set, we would be happy to follow. Just because a process isn’t in place doesn’t mean complaint can’t be raised.
Agree with your view points but they are totally irrelevant to the complaint put up.
The question here is - can community leaders defame community members based on half baked ideas?
Is lying about a new community and twisting conversations about other ecosystem leaders be overlooked.
No one is denying the work put in by Dacha.
Quoting multiple times that someone adds value to the ecosystem by his work as a way to deny wrongdoing towards community members is literally turning a blind eye to the problems faced by the community just because someone did the work they are responsible to do.
Hey @Cryptonaut (tagging in an edit because I think I messed up the reply at least once)…
Well…yes…that was my point…looking beyond (ie outside…& not addressing) the specific allegations…but in contextual response to some of the defences/comments made above…and also thinking about the nature of the debate.
…and how we proceed from this point.
It has been suggested on a number of occasions - in telegram chats, the forum in general, and above - that Rhyme was motivated by either his proposal being refused (it wasn’t)…or that he was part of a ‘Creatives Dao scam’…so also just wanted to put that into some context
Of course all allegations should be addressed evidentially.
Equally, previous contribution/behaviour isn’t an excuse for specific accusations.
Apologies, perhaps I should have made that clearer 
Sanguine utopianism has its drawbacks…
