[Closed] Near Hunters (October)

From [Approved] NEAR HUNTERS Community

  • Rewards - 2600 USD
  • Zealy - 1000 USD

From [APPROVED] NEAR Hunters community for August

  • Rewards - 500 USD

From this proposal:

I wonder a bit that you don’t know your own reward budget that you have requested.

Based on the previous proposals you are part of the team and got paid at least $2700 for the project so far, that makes your commendatory post very dubious.

I would really like to fix the situation with transactions and new active users on the network. I sincerely ask you to give me links to your projects so that I can use your experience and fix the shortcomings of our projects to improve their efficiency.
Thank you for your opinion and participation in the discussion.

1 Like

Hi @techdir thanks for the proposal and for responding to the feedback and questions from MDAO advisor @Bakaka and community member @Danielzo.

In order to consider this proposal during our October review period (happening this week), I need to see a report on activity from most recent funds (August?). I see in your July report that you did not receive funds as expected and then had to change your plans somewhat due to that. Do you have a report that you can post in the proposal for August?

Here is a link to the MarketingDAO Guidelines for October that were posted on the forum. They contain the NDC’s KPIs we are asked to focus on for allocating this month’s funds.

I’ll quote them here so it’s easier to review:

Please use the following metrics that will be used for tracking individual initiatives’ performance by Marketing (Eco) DAO. All the metrics must be attributable to the relevant project/initiative through on-chain activity and off-chain reporting, ensuring GDPR compliance and preserving privacy:

  1. Accounts retention after 1/2/4/8 weeks — the percentage of accounts who continue interacting on the chain over a given time period (higher is better)
  2. Account acquisition cost — budget divided by the number of accounts interacting through the funded initiative (lower is better)
  3. Median number of dApps used by P95 accounts retained for 1+ week (higher is better)
  4. Number of accounts retained for 1+ week using at least three dApps (higher is better)
  5. Social engagement score — some compound metric of the number of posts, likes, and followers/views in social media produced by the users.

Let’s take this example: Why should Marketing (Eco) DAO fund Project X?

  1. Project X should have a clear goal and target audience
  2. Project X should bring improvements to several metrics listed above

Based on the above, can you share:

  • Most recent report for latest funding
  • Which of the above KPIs your initiative will use if funding is received
  • How you will track and share the results with MDAO so we can have visibility into the results?
  • What is the most important aspect of this proposal, the most crucial to fund – what will have the most impact for the community?

The reality is that MDAO has 35 pending proposals for limited funds, so it is likely we will be asking for revisions and some reductions in scope in order to fund the highest impact activities and projects as we move into mid-Q4.


This calls into question your competence.

Hello! Our Report for August, if you have any questions or need an extended comment, we are always happy to respond :handshake:

1 Like

Hello Luchok! Could you please update your proposal with new KPIs ?

1 Like

You want to say that the applications that cost $30,000 will stop working as soon as you are not given funding? Should we give you money for new applications so that old ones work?

Why collaborate with you and get into such dependence? Your applications are not in demand, and their maintenance costs a maximum of $100. Your requests and threats are out of place. Then you need to be closed!

Also looks like here is another proposal for exactly the same applications, also for this month:

1 Like

Wow, just no words)))Copy past project was approved ) cool))

@Dacha @so608 We have described exactly how our projects meet the metrics and removed NEAR PIXELS from the list of funding, as we plan to go with this project for the next month, when we will write out the terms of reference in more detail. Now our task is to concentrate on applications that are already running!

1 Like

Hello, Dacha! We have updated our proposal and added compliance with metrics, if there are any more questions, we will answer them :smiley:

1 Like

This is simply an issue of interpretation, as typically individuals from different nations communicate with their own national tone. I hope you do not accuse me, as it goes against ethical norms. For instance, I was not attempting to offend anyone; excessive emotionality is not only inherent to me!) You could come to our voice or ama sessions that I lead and hear me interact with guests.

:arrow_up: What’s above I wrote myself.

:arrow_down:Below is a version of AI that softens the emotional load on sentences (It’s not me, it’s life :upside_down_face:)

This is primarily a matter of interpretation, as people from various countries often express themselves with their own cultural nuances. I trust you won’t find fault with me, as it contradicts ethical principles. For instance, I had no intention of causing offense; expressing strong emotions is not a characteristic of my communication style. You are welcome to join our voice or AMA sessions that I host, where you can observe how I interact with our guests. Best regards.

So i hope you choose what is more comfortable for you to read) Thank you from all my heart

Near Hunters is an excellent project that has proven itself a long time ago.
I often go to their AMA to chat about the NEAR ecosystem and learn a lot of relevant information


Hello team! Please join Globe DAO and Aurora community WG to continue your contribution.

Good afternoon! Can you send links to social media posts where it is written that you are a guest on AMA Hunters?

You were a guest once for all the time with the Hunters. Is this often? If you do not provide links, then you are deceiving the Near community.

Good morning, I think before blaming me, you should study the AMA format of Near Hunters, or better yet, attend it.
Anyone can come in as a listener and ask questions by voice or write them in the chat.
I was a speaker once and spoke on p2e, since I am an expert in this field and can share my experience.
Then I periodically come in as a listener when I am interested in the guest.
I don’t quite understand why you’re writing to me now and trying to find something if the main goal is to review and process the Near Hunters application.

1 Like

So much text and not a single link. And they only asked for them.

I know you don’t go to AMA Hunters. I also know who your curator is in Near.
You also praise each other with the Hunters on the forum. This looks like a conspiracy.

You come to Near for money, and for me it’s a dream. That’s the difference.

I am not obliged to prove or tell you anything but you mislead the audience with your words and you are harmful to the NEAR ecosystem.

You say: “I know you don’t go to AMA Hunters.”
These screenshots clearly show your falsehood which means you cannot be trusted.

NEAR doesn’t need dreamers, it needs specialists who will create useful products and promote the ecosystem.

People like you tend to accuse others of what they themselves are involved in.

1 Like

You claimed that you have performed many times at AMA Hunters. But it was only once. Why are you lying? It’s simple, you have a contract with the Hunters. You praise each other on the forum.

We need specialists, but you are not one of them. You are a money collector. You do not attract an audience to Near. There are no strong working game projects in Near. Why do we need game content then? We don’t need it. You were denied funding correctly, just like the Hunters.

1 Like