Hey all,
This thread has devolved into something which is adding little, if any, value to the ecosystem. As such, it will be closed.
Although I disagree with the final evaluation of the MarketingDAO in this instance, the way it is structured means that Council Members have the final call here.
This is changing. At least, some aspects of the Creatives and MarketingDAO will be evolved after NEARCON. We’ll communicate more on this
I’d’ like to encourage @agt and the team to revise their proposal and include some of the guidance here in order for it to be reassessed.
Additionally, I’d like to encourage those who support this proposal, but are not direct recipients, to leave their comments on the new thread. The MarkeitngDAO is issuing community funds, not a coffer that only they are privy to.
This is not a decentralised platform, nor is it aiming to be.
The thread is, sadly, devolving into finger pointing and, in some cases, personal comments. That’s not the environment we seek to nurture here.
Please, all, refer to the Community Guidelines.
Side Note: Unless the user on the forum has the NEAR Core
tag, they are not a part of the NEAR Foundation/Pagoda team. Being a member of the Marketing/CreativesDAO, or any other DAO, does not constitute officially representing NEAR Foundation.