@cryptocredit @so608 @Klint @Dacha @David_NEAR, I’d love that you take some time to attend to the issues I’m about to raise concerning @satojandro
The above quote from @satojandro is an impossible gryphon of contradictions that contains false accusations spun, I believe, with malicious intent.
First, he ‘notes’ that
Contextually, the word “extensive” here implies either that the project received huge funds (reference), or has been funded for a long time, or both.
This is false on all counts.
This was Culinary DAO’s first and only approved proposal. It was the month of April, 2022; total approved funds being $2000.
By what standard is a 2000 dollar one-time funding for Culinary DAO extensive as @satojandro states?
Surely it is not for lack of proper documentation that he has made the above false accusations. It is, rather, in spite of it; because he shared the link to Culinary DAO’s one and only approved proposal.
@satojandro claims the impossible by saying that the project which has been extensively funded since April
How can these two contradictory statements be true at the same time?
More offensive is his claim that Culinary DAO was cut off from funding because it missed every milestone.
This could not be further from the truth. For one, the proposal did not categorically set any milestones. Hence, it could not have “missed every milestone”. Once again, his accusation is false.
I think these issues raise significant questions as to the motivations and intentions behind @satojandro’s submissions and contributions on my proposals and God knows who else’s.
I would also like to let everyone know that this isn’t the first time he’s attempting to malign my person and work by presenting misleading information.
I completely resent this witch-hunt and bullying and demand that @satojandro recant these false claims and apologise for maligning my person and integrity.
This space must be made safe for every gender and race to build and grow without fear or bias.