A. Delegation Address: alan777.near
B. Forum Username: cloudmex-alan
C. Twitter Username: @alannetwork_
D. Website (optional): metapool.app
E. Target Voting Participation: 100% ( I will vote Abstain if case of Conflict of Interest)
F. History of Interactions with NEAR Protocol:
Since 2021, I have been actively involved in the NEAR Ecosystem, commencing with my contributions to NEAR University and other educational initiatives spearheaded by Sheriff Abushadi, former Education Lead at the NEAR Foundation at the time.
My involvement in the NEAR Hispano community has been significant, serving as a co-founder and active member. In this capacity, I have been instrumental in bringing educational opportunities to the Latin American region by organizing and running NEAR Certified Developer Bootcamps and other similar programs.
Through my work at Meta Pool, I have provided support to various NEAR Programs, including the Enterprise Node Operator Program and the Professional Node Operator Program, both of which aim to enhance the skills and expertise of node operators within the NEAR network.
At Nativo.art, I led a team that successfully launched the first 1:1 NFT marketplace on NEAR. A notable accomplishment during my tenure was the minting of the first NFT collection for the prestigious Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), marking a significant milestone in the adoption of NFTs within Mexico’s academic institutions.
Open Web Academy has been a recipient of multiple grants, which have been utilized to support educational and marketing activities within the NEAR Ecosystem. As part of my involvement with Open Web Academy, I had the opportunity to organize the Mexico node of the [REDACTED] hackathon, fostering innovation and collaboration among developers in the region.
My journey within the NEAR Ecosystem has been enriched by numerous other experiences and collaborations with friends and colleagues, contributing to the overall growth and development of the NEAR community.
G. History of Governance Participation (in NEAR or other ecosystems):
- Meta Pool Governance Advocate:
- Instrumental in designing Meta Pool’s governance system, which now boasts over 500 active voters monthly.
- Actively involved in organizing and participating in Meta Pool’s voting process.
- Supported NEAR Projects through mpDAO Grants.
- NEAR Digital Collective Candidate:
- Community-nominated and voted upon to join the NEAR Digital Collective.
- Open Web Academy and Polkadot OpenGov:
- Submitted a proposal to Polkadot’s OpenGov initiative.
- Followed up and completed the on-chain application process.
H. Top 3 Priorities for the NEAR Ecosystem:
- Support founders and developers in creating valuable applications for the ecosystem through educational programs and accelerators, to attract and retain talent within the community.
- Prioritize the community to ensure the longevity and success of the NEAR tech.
- Identify opportunities where DeFi can be impactful, with a focus on frontier markets.
I. Reasoning for any past votes in the NEAR Ecosystem:
AFAIK, Not relevant voting made by me on the NEAR Ecosystem.
J. Conflicts of Interest:
Voting power on House of Stake will be determined by stNEAR, a Meta Pool issued token. I will abstain from voting on proposals that come from teams that I currently work for, or those that have a clear conflict of interest.
K. Answer Hypothetical Delegate Scenario:
Prompt: The NEAR ecosystem is evaluating opportunities to stimulate onchain activity. In this hypothetical scenario, there are three different proposals for the Foundation to consider:
A proposal to allocate incentives to DeFi protocol users to benefit protocol metrics.
A proposal to establish a subcommittee to market the NEAR Protocol to developers and users.
A proposal to establish a Protocol-Owned Liquidity position by the House of Stake on major DeFi protocols in the ecosystem.
What additional information would you need from the proposers to make an informed decision?
For the DeFi protocol incentives proposal, I would need details on the specific protocols targeted, the allocation mechanism, and the expected impact on key metrics like TVL, transaction volume, and user retention. Additionally, I would want to understand the long-term sustainability of the incentives and whether they align with the broader goals of the NEAR ecosystem.
For the subcommittee marketing proposal, I would request a clear plan outlining the subcommittee’s structure, budget, and key performance indicators (KPIs). It would be important to know how the subcommittee intends to differentiate NEAR from competitors and what specific strategies they will employ to attract developers and users.
For the Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) proposal, I would seek information on the size of the liquidity positions, the selection criteria for the DeFi protocols, and the expected return on investment. I would also want to understand the risks involved, such as impermanent loss, and how the House of Stake plans to manage these risks.
What key metrics would you evaluate to support or reject the proposals?
For the DeFi incentives proposal, I would evaluate metrics such as the increase in Total Value Locked (TVL), the growth in daily active users, and the overall transaction volume. Additionally, I would look at the cost-effectiveness of the incentives in driving sustainable growth.
For the subcommittee marketing proposal, I would assess metrics like the number of new developers onboarded, the increase in active wallets, and the growth in the number of dApps deployed on NEAR. I would also consider the cost per acquisition (CPA) and the overall return on investment (ROI) of the marketing efforts.
For the POL proposal, I would evaluate the liquidity depth and trading volume in the targeted DeFi protocols, the yield generated from the liquidity positions, and the impact on the overall stability and attractiveness of the NEAR ecosystem. I would also monitor the risk-adjusted returns and the potential for impermanent loss.
How would you ultimately support and vote for these different proposals?
For the DeFi incentives proposal, I would support it if the data shows a clear path to sustainable growth in TVL and user activity without excessive reliance on continuous incentives. I would vote in favor if the proposal demonstrates a strong alignment with the long-term goals of the NEAR ecosystem.
For the subcommittee marketing proposal, I would support it if the plan is well-structured, cost-effective, and has a high potential to attract quality developers and users. I would vote in favor if the KPIs are realistic and the subcommittee has a clear strategy to differentiate NEAR in the competitive blockchain space.
For the POL proposal, I would support it if the liquidity positions are expected to generate significant yield and enhance the overall stability of the NEAR ecosystem. I would vote in favor if the risks are well-managed and the proposal aligns with the strategic objectives of the House of Stake and the broader NEAR community.
L. What is your motivation for becoming a NEAR delegate?
Sharing the Experience:
We aim to leverage the experience we’ve gained over the years and apply it to valuable initiatives like NEAR Governance, contributing to the development of more robust and transparent governance systems, similar to what we’re building at Meta Pool.
Supporting Brighter Governance:
Our focus is on supporting the creation of more transparent and effective governance structures, like the one we’re developing at Meta Pool, to foster a more inclusive and participatory decision-making process within the community.
Community-Driven NEAR Protocol:
We observe that the NEAR Protocol technology is community-driven, with high levels of community involvement. We aim to maintain this ethos, ensuring that all participants have a fair and equal opportunity to contribute and benefit from the ecosystem. This approach promotes a sustainable and equitable environment where everyone can thrive.
M. Anticipated delegation support (if applicable) (Please describe the anticipated breakdown of delegated voting power, including any relevant self-delegation or large investors/core team members you wish to disclose).
It is a very active participant in the NEAR Ecosystem and the results obtained in the validator program are proof of this. 
