A. Delegation Address:
lucasmetapool.near
B. Forum Username:
Lucascasp1
C. Twitter Username:
D. Website (optional):
E. Target Voting Participation:
100% ( I will vote Abstain if case of Conflict of Interest)
F. History of Interactions with NEAR Protocol:
I started interacting with NEAR in April 2020 when I joined Meta Pool as a Project Manager. Since then, I have been actively involved in the ecosystem, driving key initiatives for its growth.
Some of the main activities I have participated in include:
Token Listings: We managed the integration of Meta Pool tokens on various platforms, such as CoinGecko.
Participation in NEAR forums: We contribute to the development of improvement proposals through the MPIP (Meta Pool Improvement Proposal on dev.near) system, fostering discussions and key decisions for the community.
Validator Program: We developed this program in collaboration with the NEAR Foundation to facilitate the onboarding of new validators and encourage more participants to join the ecosystem.
Grant Rounds: We organize funding rounds to support the development of new initiatives presented by various teams within the ecosystem.
G. History of Governance Participation (in NEAR or other ecosystems):
As a Meta Pool Governance Advocate, I played a key role in shaping the governance framework, ensuring a decentralized and community-driven decision-making process.
- Contributed to the design and implementation of Meta Pool’s governance system, which now engages over 500 active voters each month.
- Actively organized and participated in governance discussions, fostering transparency and community engagement in Meta Pool’s voting process.
- Supported various NEAR ecosystem projects by facilitating funding opportunities through mpDAO Grants, empowering builders and initiatives that drive innovation within the network.
Through these efforts, I have helped strengthen governance participation, enhance decision-making structures, and promote sustainable ecosystem growth.
H. Top 3 Priorities for the NEAR Ecosystem:
To ensure sustainable growth and adoption, the NEAR ecosystem must focus on three key priorities:
Attracting Users – Expanding the user base is essential for the long-term success of NEAR. This involves improving user experience, simplifying onboarding processes, and fostering community engagement to drive real adoption. Additionally, allowing users to stake NEAR directly with validators requires us to review the incentives for veNEAR holders, ensuring long-term alignment between stakers and the network’s security.
Supporting Builders – Developers are the backbone of any blockchain ecosystem. Providing grants, technical resources, and mentorship programs will empower builders to create innovative applications and expand the utility of the network.
Developing Frontier Markets – Strengthening NEAR’s presence in emerging markets is crucial for global adoption. This includes supporting localized projects, forming strategic partnerships, and addressing region-specific challenges to unlock new opportunities.
By focusing on these priorities, we can drive meaningful adoption and establish NEAR as a leading blockchain ecosystem.
I. Reasoning for any past votes in the NEAR Ecosystem:
AFAIK, Not relevant voting made by me on the NEAR Ecosystem.
J. Conflicts of Interest:
I will abstain from voting in any situation involving a potential conflict of interest. Ensuring transparency and fairness in governance is essential for the integrity of the NEAR ecosystem.
The stNEAR token will be used for voting, allowing holders to actively participate in governance decisions.
It will be possible to lock stNEAR and then obtain veNEAR, enabling long-term alignment with the ecosystem’s development.
If a vote presents a conflict of interest, participants have the option to abstain from voting to maintain neutrality and avoid undue influence.
By upholding these principles, we reinforce the credibility of the decision-making process and ensure the ecosystem remains decentralized and community-driven.
To ensure transparency and fairness in governance, I will abstain from voting in any situation involving a potential conflict of interest. The stNEAR token will be used for voting, allowing holders to actively participate in governance decisions. It will be possible to convert stNEAR to veNEAR, enabling long-term alignment with the ecosystem’s development. If a vote presents a conflict of interest, participants have the option to abstain from voting to maintain neutrality and avoid undue influence. By upholding these principles, we reinforce the credibility of the decision-making process and ensure the ecosystem remains decentralized and community-driven.
K. Answer Hypothetical Delegate Scenario:
Prompt: The NEAR ecosystem is evaluating opportunities to stimulate onchain activity. In this hypothetical scenario, there are three different proposals for the Foundation to consider:
A proposal to allocate incentives to DeFi protocol users to benefit protocol metrics.
A proposal to establish a subcommittee to market the NEAR Protocol to developers and users.
A proposal to establish a Protocol-Owned Liquidity position by the House of Stake on major DeFi protocols in the ecosystem.
What additional information would you need from the proposers to make an informed decision?
What key metrics would you evaluate to support or reject the proposals?
How would you ultimately support and vote for these different proposals?
Key Information Required from Proposers
- Clear Objectives & Expected Impact:
- A well-defined purpose and quantifiable outcomes demonstrating alignment with NEAR’s goals.
- Clear articulation of how the proposal will benefit the NEAR ecosystem and its users.
- Budget & Resource Allocation:
- A detailed budget outlining how funds will be utilized.
- Explanation of resource allocation, including team members and their respective roles.
- Execution Plan & Timeline:
- A clear roadmap with milestones and deadlines.
- Details on implementation strategy and timeline for achieving objectives.
- Risk Assessment & Mitigation:
- Identification of potential risks and challenges.
- Strategies to mitigate these risks and ensure project success.
- Sustainability & Long-Term Vision:
- Demonstration of the proposal’s long-term viability and potential for self-sustainability.
- Alignment with NEAR’s long-term goals and vision for the future.
Key Metrics for Evaluation
- Proposal 1 (Incentives for DeFi Users):
- TVL growth: Increase in total value locked in NEAR DeFi protocols.
- Unique users: Number of new and active users interacting with NEAR DeFi.
- Transaction volume: Overall transaction activity on NEAR DeFi platforms.
- User retention: Percentage of users who continue to engage with NEAR DeFi over time.
- Proposal 2 (Subcommittee for Marketing NEAR):
- Developer engagement: Number of developers building on NEAR and contributing to the ecosystem.
- Active wallets: Increase in the number of active NEAR wallets.
- Social engagement: Growth in social media metrics and community engagement around NEAR.
- Partnerships: Number of new partnerships and collaborations established to promote NEAR.
- Proposal 3 (Protocol-Owned Liquidity in DeFi):
- ROI: Return on investment for the protocol-owned liquidity strategy.
- Market depth: Improvement in market depth and liquidity for NEAR-based assets.
- Slippage: Reduction in slippage for traders on NEAR DeFi platforms.
- Sustainability: Long-term sustainability and effectiveness of the protocol-owned liquidity model.
Voting Consideration & Support Strategy
- Proposal 1:
- Support contingent upon evidence of sustainable user retention and positive impact on the overall health of the NEAR protocol.
- Focus on metrics that demonstrate genuine user engagement and long-term value creation.
- Proposal 2:
- Support dependent on the establishment of clear KPIs and measurable goals for ecosystem growth.
- Emphasis on data-driven strategies and demonstrable progress towards marketing objectives.
- Proposal 3:
- Prioritized if it presents a strategic advantage in securing long-term liquidity without incurring excessive costs.
- Support contingent on its ability to maintain ecosystem stability and facilitate healthy market conditions.
Overall Support Strategy
The overarching strategy is to support the proposal(s) that demonstrate the greatest potential to maximize long-term value for NEAR and foster sustainable adoption. This involves a careful evaluation of each proposal’s objectives, execution plan, and potential impact on the NEAR ecosystem. The decision will be guided by data-driven analysis, clear metrics, and a focus on long-term sustainability and growth.
L. What is your motivation for becoming a NEAR delegate?
Leveraging Our Experience
We strive to apply the knowledge and insights we’ve gained over the years to meaningful initiatives like NEAR Governance, helping to shape more resilient and transparent governance frameworks—much like the system we are building at Meta Pool.
Advancing Transparent Governance
Our commitment lies in fostering efficient and transparent governance models that empower communities. By developing robust structures, such as the one at Meta Pool, we aim to enhance inclusivity and encourage active participation in decision-making processes.
Strengthening Community-Led Governance in NEAR
NEAR Protocol thrives on community-driven innovation, with strong engagement from its members. Our goal is to uphold this ethos by ensuring that every participant has an equal opportunity to contribute and benefit, fostering a sustainable and equitable ecosystem for long-term growth.
Exploring AI for Governance and Adoption
I am particularly interested in leveraging artificial intelligence within the protocol, both in the development of AI-driven agents and in mechanisms that enhance adoption and usability. Implementing AI can optimize decision-making, improve user experience, and create more adaptive governance models that drive long-term engagement within the ecosystem.
M. Anticipated delegation support (if applicable) (Please describe the anticipated breakdown of delegated voting power, including any relevant self-delegation or large investors/core team members you wish to disclose).
