[Closed] February TRAVEL

[David_NEAR]

@dmitryne

but it will can be top photo in National Geographic Magazine tommorow it depends how to use ability.

And after this u can say disagree.

Right, and that’s a great objective to have. However, in your proposal you did not share any of this.

Hence, there was no connection to having a photo of someone with a NEAR flag to a focus on Marketing.

@dmitryne

I feel just like u don’t like to approve this purposal,

That’s not the case. I think you should generally structure proposals like this:

@David_NEAR

Initiative summary, be sure to include:

• Expected impact and value you foresee for the NEAR ecosystem/community
• Metrics for measuring success
• Estimated timeline and achievement milestones

Most of the initiatives you’ve proposed here don’t have this.

@dmitryne

I would like discuss about Marketing with people who like to explore marketing , who like to grow with it.

@David_NEAR

There is no requirement to fulfill NEAR’s marketing goals. That’s not what the MarketingDAO exists to fund, there’s an internal marketing department for that.

I’d generally advise to not consider that, to an extent.,

This logic i don’t understand.

The MarketingDAO is not a decentralised marketing arm for NEAR Foundation or the NEAR Protocol.

So long as you’re building on or around NEAR, then the MarketingDAO exists to fund your marketing initiatives to help you achieve success. If that happens to overlap with what NEAR is focusing on then great. But it’s not a requirement.