Together with other channels, Near Insider is one of the pioneers to support the ecosystem since the early days. To reach the current form, we have expanded our team & pour a lot of effort into the channel. We have a research team who work around the clock to ensure we deliver the latest news in the quickest manner, and every news is original. It’s disheartening to hear that we pumping out content that is similar to what others are putting out, since we also feel sad whenever we see any post from a different channel with the same research content, same numbers, different design & post after us without any credit. At the end of the day, we think it’s still good for the ecosystem to spread that positive news. And what is clear is that the value of a channel of 40K followers is completely different from a channel of 5K, 10K followers, about impressions, interactions.
A channel with quality content will be different from a channel with lower quality content. We have a clear content orientation, for each clear audience. Proof of this quality is sharing from Near Protocol, Illa (Founder), Marieke (CEO), NEARWEEK, and more.
And you can see our creative content unlike other channels
Next is about the quality of the AMA, many projects contact us to organize the AMA, the number of listeners reaches a stable level of over 100. You can check here:
Thank you for your suggestion & we’ll do our best to increase our brand voice.
I hope the boards treat us more like a recession contributor than a broker. We do our best to expand the relationship with the projects to receive the latest updates and provide special services for token launch/long term promotion plan/minting event/… which I think it’s hard to get the marketing DAO to take care of that and that’s why they weren’t included in the proposal. So please don’t treat us like a broker, we are purely a communication channel that has put a lot of effort into standing out from other contributors and your support for an ecosystem is great. necessary, needs.
Some of the projects we charge are because they need priority campaigns such as product launches, need a strategy and master plan, followed by projects in the infrastructure category that they are interested and want to reach users of the Near ecosystem.
But this has absolutely no effect on the quantity and quality that we committed to when submitting this proposal. The projects that we have supported during the past time are more than 50 projects, you can check here:
In term of the budget, we also offer lower reward than other channels, you can compare other offer here. Is there any criteria for judging, I expect a fair one
I understand this & your good intention. The proposal has been revised to $7000 according to @satojandro’s suggestions. I hope to receive one more of your approval. If anything else still needs to be adjusted, please let me know. Thank you very much, I appreciate that!
Finally, I would like to confirm to the @marketingdao-council that you guys support our youtube channel? Since this is a long term value, we need time but I believe it is really helpful for the ecosystem. But if you think it’s useless, we will stop it immediately