( Announcement ) Broken Rules of NDC Community Guidelines

Totally Agree, Ill try to build my reputation again

@Albhion at first I’d say you did a very wrong thing which isn’t expected of you as a renowned member of the NDC. This is a practical sabotage to your position as a Near DC moderator. A dog isn’t supposed to bite a bone hung on its neck, and that’s exact offense you committed here.

Be it as it may, I commend you for admitting and being able to write an open apology to the Near ecosystem, which is a very good step towards reconciliation and moving forward.

Like @joepmaenen said your post at as a Near DC mod will be relieved. But I want to be sure @joepmaenen

How long will @Albhion’s punishment last?
Because I see there’s every reason for reconciliation after serving due punishment.

In this case, this will be an apt lesson to everyone working in the NDC, planning such misconduct to be fore warned.

As NDC Mods lead, I think Albhion should be let go of his NDC Moderator position indefinitely. His position will likely be filled by someone else. If lots of people object to this, I’m willing to reconsider.

But I don’t think we can allow a person that has shown misconduct to stay on or turn back into a role that is supposed to prevent that same misconduct from happening. It is a serious breach of trust, which is essential to the role he was fulfilling. Perhaps the sanction would be different if this misconduct happened in a different role.

However, in my opinion, this does not mean that I think that Albhion is not allowed to fulfill other roles in the NEAR community. And that is also not my decision to make. The community is now aware of what happened and can take this event into consideration going forward. As Albhion showed great remorse, I do hope he will be able to earn back the trust that he lost. I do believe in second chances.

I think that is all I have to say about this matter, I will leave the rest to the community.

6 Likes

What ever decision taken is fine, but I just hope this doesn’t repeat itself because it doesn’t really sound nice.

2 Likes

I believe we have the Reconcilatory Work group to handle matters of this such nature

Looking to see how this breach and miss conduct iams handled

1 Like

Again and again. Sad to see this stuff keep happening.

3 Likes

Thanks @Ola we’ll have to seek the community’s stand on this… I’ll discuss with the Reconciliation Working group in our meeting to know how best we can get the community to give their feedback on this issue.

Meanwhile let’s keep building :v::dove::purple_heart:

Are you saying this is a repeated action?

It’s so sad Albhion is always involved in such activities, this shows no value to the community, what he did is biased and it’s so sad he keeps making same mistake all over and all over again knowing fully well he has reputable roles.
I wonder why involve in such misconduct to untidy your reputation.
However the did has been done and hope others learn from his mistakes.

4 Likes

“Because I see there’s every reason for reconciliation after serving due punishment.”

NO

1 Like

I applaud the original poster for taking responsibility. When will the parties responsible for creating these malign incentives step forward to do the same? There are no excuses in leadership.

The misconduct of individuals is secondary to the real problem of malign incentives. Of course there should be accountability for misconduct, but attacking the symptoms while ignoring the underlying disease is short sighted.

The entire endeavor is an effort to shoe-horn a political economy onto what should be a simple, meritocratic, market-based process. The voting process is irrelevant to value creation. Even worse, it detracts from value creation.

https://twitter.com/neardc/status/1664577098940403713

The @neardc invites all NEAR communities to compete for great rewards and more voting power. !

In their own words, “communities must now compete for voting power”

Shouldn’t creators compete in the market instead? Shouldn’t we be competing to release products which serve users and on-board them into the NEAR ecosystem? There’s no meritocracy in the voting mechanism, just more politics.

This is just more doubling-down on past failures. The political economy has eclipsed the underlying utility.

Recently on a Twitter space on the topic of cartels and corruption, a member of the NDC even claimed that, “We need to emulate what states are doing…”

Excuse me, I thought we were entrepreneurs? States create corruption by creating public goods which are not subject to free-market incentives. This detracts from the value creation of entrepreneurs. For all of the big titles, resumes and hubris thrown around here, you’d think someone would understand these basics.

Looking at the past vaporware debacles and understanding the underlying malign incentives which precipitated these events should be paramount. The malfeasance of a single bad actor is irrelevant if the NDC, NF or whichever bureau is insisting on repeating the same mistakes by providing more of the same malign incentives.

I applaud the original poster for taking responsibility. When will the parties responsible for creating these malign incentives step forward to do the same? There are no excuses in leadership.

If we are going to be serious here, it is time to consider a new merit based approach.

6 Likes

100% Agree
No way to “reconciliation” and get back to NDC

2 Likes

Hello Everyone,

This person is always involved in such activities, this shows no value to the community.

Last time he created fake accounts to troll some good projects and to troll members who don’t agree with him. ( rememeber how a fake account was trolling @Monish016 for his project)

He approaches eevryone to associate with him and then forces them to give him NEAR tokens by saying he will speak to the Moderators and got the proposal approved. All mods know him and take his advice too.

I think he should be banned but then he will come again with a fake account.

6 Likes

The abuse will continue until the incentives for bad behavior are removed.

This is just one case which has been detected. The tip of the iceberg which is visible. It isn’t difficult to imagine how others would be evading detection.

4 Likes

This is a case of abuse of power
Manipulation and Breach of trust. The reconciliation WG could have stepped in if there had been any conflict arising from this matter.

The offender has received a punishment from the team of moderators, if there be any need for further queries, it. Should come from the Transparency Commission of which haven’t gone live…

Let’s believe that the punishment the offender is serving is befitting for now, until the Transparency Commission is live.

Let’s keep building :v::dove::purple_heart:

2 Likes

I dont see how this is different from @JohnX situation @Dabbie3229

While others are working to add value, we have a few cmint to grab tokens in whatever way. This is not funny at all.

I wish there is a better wsy to handle things but one suggestion i will make is that its high time we stop throwing bounties out there just anyhow. People that have shown proof of work over time.can be called upon to do stuff.

12 Likes

Saw all the comments, and really appreciate your feedback and apologize for my mistake.

But as you see, I just Onboard people who are true artist and not from web3 background, because of lack of knowledge of Web3 socials, just helped them to communicate in my way , which I saw it’s not right.

But seeing all the comments, so many people still thinking I am fraud or doing mallicous activities near . Which is I am not , just I took wrong way to bring people for the bounty.

I request to all people please forgive me for my mistake and let’s build together again :pray:

Because - WE ARE COMMUNITY

1 Like

It’s totally different @IgbozeIsrael The person not much active on tg that’s why I replied behalf of them .
It’s not about asking funds or proposing any thing on behalf of them.

You have been a part of the NEAR Ecosystem since October 29th, 2021, and yet you are still engaging in such behavior?
@Albhion

  1. Is this the first time you have engaged in this behavior, or is it a repeated offence?
  2. Do you approach new members and ask them to pay you to influence community moderators?
  3. Do you tell NEAR members that you are part of the core team, even though you are not, and that you can influence their votes in polls?
  4. Do you create fake accounts and troll members who do not agree with you?

I want the moderators to know this @creativesdao-council @marketingdao-council how he uses the mods name to make quick bucks.

I don’t know whay do we entertain such people. Now he goes and puts another post to divert the topic.

4 Likes

Hello @JakieRodz
What kind of allegations is this, do you have any proof just tell me.

Please share the proof I want to know what kind of misunderstanding is this !!

Give me one name that I told that I am a NEAR member even you can see I just mentioned on my Twitter only NEAR DAO Member

Why would Ill do that and in which context?

Also if you have still doubts let’s connect on meet adding any council member in loop, Thanks

It is my duty to share my updates, you can see there are so many posts and updates I share if you check my proposal