-
As a Community DAO council I onboarded ~ 20 new active community members (Russian guild, Near Crowd guild , GOA guild).
Some guys got onboarding fee reimbursement from me , 0.1 N. -
With people from Russian guild and my friends from Near Crowd, where we work together, describe pictures, building AI (I’m currently work for Near Crowd and volunteering at Marketing DAO, Near Discord Russian thread) found a project from one of our active member who has been created a Crowd bot. All together we made decision nominate him for rewards from Community DAO.
-
We prepared a proposal, created two articles on on-chain Near wiki
and uploaded the proposal on Astro DAO
https://app.astrodao.com/dao/community.sputnik-dao.near/proposals/community.sputnik-dao.near-205
- 36 members (32%) supported it - the best involvement in the Astro DAO’s history.
Proposal from community and for community . Great example how must it work in Democratic Community Driven DAO’s where leadership don’t chase put community money in own pocket.
I believe the DAO should be a place of voting for all pivotal changes, community guidelines or new DAO’s structures and procedures.
We don’t need to strive “quantity” of members. Instead of it, should be focused on onboarding active community members who are willing to participate in Near Community life.
I hope NF agree with it and will not consider Community DAO as another one experiment. @Grace @chronear (May be interesting for you too).
Thanks and have a great time in Denver.