Sandbox [January] Reward Claim of [Bernard Jeba Raja#3755]

[FritzWorm]

Hello Bernard, I shared with you my feedback on your last submission for december. I told you that you have no interaction on your tweets, so you community is not giving you likes or reading your content.

Not even 1 clap for your medium post, will be helpful if you can share the metrics from your post.

Almost 0 interaction on twitter

The idea was that you resolve the situation, use the feedback to improve, here we are always ready to help. And after it is resolved, you must make the reward claim. But doing it knowing that the communication work is poor is a failure, I really regret it.

Record

I will have to review your claim with my teammates, please take a look of this quote:

@Sofia_Alum

Tier 3 → Tier 4

• If you work gets entirely rejected by OWS Council, that means that some more learning (and probably motivation) has to be shown before your work can be compensated by OWS. After one becomes Tier 4, one cannot submit any work to OWS during the next 2 months (i.e. 2 rounds of rewards from time of the second rejection). One should use this period to develop some basic understanding of the NEAR ecosystem, its values and core principles and probably reconsider the motivation to be in OWS. Being in Tier 4 means that you have submitted poor quality work twice and were ignoring moderators feedback to improve; that we have not seen you looking for ways to learn from peer Sandboxers or other community members. Please, keep in mind that low motivation is a core element here. If we notice individuals who show up only during the reward period and do not bring any other value, they will be soon classified to Tier 4. Further, after 2 months Tier 4 contributor can apply to join Tier 3 again if they can show the community their progress in learning curve and motivation (e.g. sufficient improvement in work done, engagement with with other Guilds/projects, active seeking for feedback)