Our policy is not explicit, but it is simple: we have 3 groups - one of council, to coordinate the administrative life of the DAO and the direction of it; one of members, for PhD philosophers or Phd students known by one of us, which has the same proposal and voting power as the council and which compose the DAO as the basic group (council is administrative group created from members); and one for community, this one with restricted voting power to polls, where we accept master and grad students on philosophy and people interested on it, and also known by us. To be known by one of us or to be invited by one of the members is a nice criterium because it makes it probable that the person entering in the DAO is a real and honest person. In case a person is not known by us and wants to enter the DAO, in the community, for example, s/he must have made some valuable projects inside our DAO and to pass through a video-call for us to know the person; we should also know more about the person in the physical world, the cv and things like that.
In case of voting on bounties, we use telegram polls, where we only count member and community groups votes. Many people vote in this telegram poll, even people not from the DAO, but we only count DAO’s votes. After having the votes, we go to astro and we confirm the winners.