@Naboto going through the post you’re addressing the issues in a rude way.
Argument is suppose to lead to a solution else it’s a waste or exchanging utterances.
We can argue in a friendly way since both parties disagree on a theme, and the best way to argue is to agree on same goal. When arguing and no conclusion or solution it’s implies no result.
In some aspect @Naboto is right as the creative needs restructuring and voting principles.
As I don’t see a code of conduct or guidelines that governs the creative community.
I would outline some issues and hope for change
- The creative accepts proposal from only DAO but most times people receive funds to personal wallet
And this proposal was approved. Though later changed the wallet cause @David_NEAR complained.
How can a DAO fund go to personal wallet?
And how can a DAO consist of 2 members? So what if I propose a DAO with my account and a fictitious account which is also mine meaning I can open a DAO and get funded? That’s risky to community funds the higher the number of DAO members the stronger the DAO.
- Financial equilibrium:
Most people propose funds higher than the original amount
And I fell @Dacha words wasn’t considered here cause he wasn’t part of the creative leader I guess and this made me considering the proposal of @mixmore on this post
I think it is necessary to build an integrated financial and accounting system for NEAR This system should be able to perform the following tasks Part 1 Financial Accounting 1.Preparing basic financial statements balance sheet, income statement (profit and loss) and cash flow statement 2.Organizing and building a chart of accounts for NEAR 3.General ledger accounts 4.Organizing all accounts of external and internal parties dealing with NEAR 5.Organizing revenue, expense and treasury accou…
We need a financial system and people in charge of that too.
- How can a proposal be approved by the creative mod on forum and need to be approved by DAO on Astro??
I have never seen a proposal approved on forum and rejected on Astro so with my calculations all approved proposal are always approved by the DAO cause most DAO are nonchalant on viewing proposal before voting they just vote
A question if the proposal that has been approved by creative gets rejected on Astro by DAO what next? Would the creative change the proposal from approved to close or rejected?
Why not DAO do the question on forum and approval on forum then the creative mods vote yes/no on the CFC on Astro.
This would reduce random tags of DAO to vote on the creative group. Since the creative has to vote and also bring engagement on forum and make DAO councils active too on forum.
And hope @NDC_Comms gets to find a better solution on this.
-
Delay of funding from NF most times change plans and arrangements of DAO as people work with time and has already map out their responsibilities or events
-
A community member been a council member in multiple DAO especially when the DAO has voting power on Astro it’s manipulates fair voting system
While Marketing
- Delay to replying proposal, as most proposal get replies late while we’ve minimum of 5 council to vote. At least the council members can devote at least 2hrs of their time for the community on forum.
- Marketing council making a proposal and been approved by fellow council of marketing needs to make a pool to the community DAO for approval for fairness and proper voting
- Since I’ve been 1 year plus in the forum @David_NEAR has been so committed in the marketing and Ecosystem in a while as he has been always active and brings justice to the community interest even when he stepped down from the marketing council he was and still active
and @Dacha always active too and has an eye of an Eagle watching and making comments on forum.
This is my own opinion, I didn’t point fingers or have anyone in mind just giving my thoughts to the community from POV as democracy implies major power are been vested to the people and the majority of the people decisions are been considered over minority
Concerning abuse or disrespect of persons on forum we need commission and forces in charge of having the rules implemented as I’ve mentioned this before
And I think we need a committee in charge of making people abide by the rules, code of conduct and protocol of Near. This committee can be inchage of making sure people abide by the rules and also teach about democracy, code of conduct, and also other schemes that would make Near the best community and as to grow in unity
Thank you guys for reading and hope we grow together and become part of the top Blockchains with great governance
Together as one we all achieve more