Hello @Dacha, please have a look at my previous comment. Also, as mentioned in our Marketing proposals we have until now created all our visuals, social media schedule, posts etc. Even when FR was supporting, we created all the content ourselves and just asked for support for promoting the NFT projects.
Given the restructuring of our DAO in terms of work distribution, we decided to request help for this position. We have been deliberating about this in the last 2 weeks after our marketing proposal had been sent.
The way we envisioned this was to use the Marketing funds (in the case of twitter 250 DAI per month) to pay to the responsible person, regardless if it would be someone from the muti council/team or external support. The fees for OWS would be paid from a muti buffer or in this case 50 DAI from the marketing support and the 200 DAI for the Twitter manager. We did not mention this in our Marketing proposal because
a) at the time this decision was not clear yet and
b) we also only knew about the OWS fee after contacting them directly. We understand that OWS also wants to become more self-sustainable and do not know their funding structure so at this point, in order to find a suitable Twitter manager, we were up to pay this fee.
This just to clarify that the budget requested from Marketing will be used as stated (IG, FB, Twitter etc.) just that instead of the council managing it will be a contributor from OWS if they are able to find one.
Please let us know in case this is creating confusion. In case this is not possible due to the requested funds, we’d be happy to get a suggestion on how to branch out our social media team and find a suitable contributor.