All concerns and questions were clarified by @ supercoolkay in the proposal comment section.
If you would check closely, the remark @Supercoolkay made was not copied but updated in the original proposal. @ted.iv recommeded this approach sometimes around June.
I believe the @creativesdao-council concerns was not communicated before moving this to “close”. It was all a misunderstanding from the moderators and I am glad @ Supercoolkay has been able to clear it with @ kc_sollano.
Now that everything has been cleared and there’s a better understanding. It will be great if the moderators can have a brief meeting to decide on this again. Since there’s no rule that state that proposal tagged as “closed” can not be revisited.
Tagging : @adrianseneca , @blusw @Cryptonaut @hevertonharieno @Monish016 @williamx @Paul . Please deliberate on this again.
With love,
Near x Art.