Thanks. The clarifications I made here was the same thing I stated earlier in the proposal where the questions were asked initially. I understand that these write ups may appear lengthy therefore you may not be able to go through everything in details.
Hi captain,
I thought I cleared this earlier, there was nothing like “copy and pasted remarks” I answered all the questions @williamx asked in full details and I updated the information in the original proposal just like @ted.iv will always tell me to do,
(update any changes made in the comments to the original proposal for transparency sake)
The @creativesdao-council did not reach out for further clarity on the proposal but decided to close it on just a mere misunderstanding that could have been “asked” or talked out. Even if you suggest we hop on a call to get things better and clearer instead of just “closing”.
Spiritual Dao proposal for august went through a long debate and conversation before decision were made on its approval… It will be only fair if the near x art Dao’s proposal is looked at again. I am not against “closing” a proposal but it should not be on the basis of a little misunderstanding.
I understand how time consuming the moderator’s task could be but it would be best to reach out for clarity in matters like this. All the reasons to why this proposal was closed is already cleared and I am glad you are satisfied with the answers.
The creatives Dao has been preaching sustainability for a while now. Our major step towards sustainability should not be frowned at. Our sustainability goal is going to crumble if we do not get funding for this month all because of a misunderstanding from the side of the creatives moderators.
Next month will be dedicated to reaching another goal and this cannot be attained if this month’s goal is not achieved.
Thank you for always staying in touch.
We look forward to receiving a positive response!
Best,
Near x art.
@creativesdao-council 