Hey @INFINITY,
We have heard your concerns on this and I reviewed @Dacha’s posts personally.
Although I believe that Dacha’s previous behavior was inappropriate, this seems to have changed over the past few weeks.
I can’t see any posts recently which may have violated the Community Guidelines. Many of the questions Dacha is asking serve to provide a level of community-driven accountability which is essential when it comes to decentralised governance.
Can you please specify which questions/posts in particular?
Openness and transparency are some of the values of the NEAR Foundation and, indeed, the nature of blockchain as a whole. This should be reflected by everyone on the forum.
I think this is a little harsh. We should hold everyone to an equally high standard and nobody should be singled out
We’re working on ways to engage Guild Leaders as we speak. This includes the creation of a group (not category or thread) within the Governance Forum which will allow mass synchronous communication to all Guild Leaders.
Something like your suggestion might work, too. However, I’m unsure how this relates to Dacha. Additionally, I think communication and contributions should be as open and transparent as possible.
Can you please share which posts, in particular, you’re referring to? If you’d like to flag a post in the future, I’d encourage you to flag a post with the admins
Has Dacha, or any other community member, DM’d you via the forum or communicated with you through another avenue that has led to this post and concerns? If so, please do let us know and we’ll be happy to discuss it further.
Ultimately, I don’t believe any action needs to be taken against any member of the forum at this time. If you think otherwise, or you have specific concerns, can you please drop the links to each post/thread/reply here?
Keep up the awesome work on the City Node front 