Still learn the ropes. Unfortunately, i see significant delays. Sorry, about it.
Current Marketing DAO proposals list with councils activities
Marketing DAO .pdf (91.0 KB)
Revisionist history, like a true revolutionary. Why did you delete your contribution?
Very daring of you to publicly accuse me of harassment and hate speech.
You like transparency? I’m happy post our entire conversation from the Marketing DAO. I explicitly told you we were having the conversation there so other Council members would be witnesses.
I appreciate @Dacha for help with my projects. I think he just want Near ecosystem become more strong and bigger
I hope you too support this direction?
Why u fight? Can we find piecefull solution?
tf is so called ‘NearCommunity’ and this guild?
I wonder what were the goals you guys determined/discussed together? @Dacha
was attacking community learders/members and posting +18 pr…n pictures part of the plan?
Good morning. Sorry, I’m not a part of NC community, not an author or content creator , I don’t like their pictures. I immediately removed information in my report when got terrible pictures from our council. Initially, NC community manager asked to me help him with DAO creation. His main goal was come lgbt people together in one safe place/group, because Russian government chases lgbt people .
Have a great day!
19 requests by December 1st are still pending. I propose mark them as [Closed] and send notifications to authors @marketingdao-council
Except recently approved [ Approved] C1 Guild November Social Media Management
GM, you can mark them as closed according to the internal SLAs written up (not public yet as draft isn’t complete)
- working with new Marketing DAO guide (new form of reports, proposals procedure))
- calls with Russian-speaking grantees, help with proposals/reports
- working with new proposals
Current list of proposals, activities, reports, delays, etc. Added Marketing DAO advisors
Propose add them in @marketingdao-council list on the forum
Marketing DAO - Sheet1(1).pdf (98.7 KB)
Couldn’t attend on today’s Marketing DAO meeting, because one of Marketing DAO council @grace made a decision, without any approvals from other Marketing DAO councils, about mandatory using video images on the calls.
Any DAO Council where the NF participates will require that from now, during Council meetings, all Council members show their face before the meeting starts (then can switch off the camera after that) additionally, for the council members to share their real name.
I consider this part of developing TRUST. Until today, we do not know your name or even seen your face in any meeting.
We will start minimizing exposure to anonymous agents in every possible way and more so, in relation to DAO Council Members.
I invite all Council members of the Marketing DAO to share their opinions.
Could you please create a separate proposal about it?
I’m not sure that you can just say “from now”. It’s not a decentralized or community driven way. I believe It should be public discussion and public voting, because it going to spread on all community members and potential Marketing, Ecosystem and other DAO’s councils before NF councils step out from DAO’s (deadline March 2022).
Furthermore, you’re a manager and team leader of half of Marketing DAO councils.
Will be great to see public discussion about it and public voting on our first community driven DAO
I created a proposal about it .
- It can be real photo instead of video (due many reasons)
Councils can complete KYC to confirm their identity.
Another one very important question is safety. I got many threats after my investigations and reports.
I think that this is fair.
It’s a prominent position in the community and you’re handling the community fund so a certain level of personal (not pseudonymous) accountability is to be expected and, IMO, fair.
There are hundreds of thousands of dollars of funding which, ultimately, belongs to the community being distributed through the MarketingDAO (and others).
Yes, and KYC is solution.
KYC is a solution for internal verification, I don’t think it solves the level of accountability that the community may expect
Dave I’m here since last summer , I see how some people gets money without any questions and reports. Or all kind of organization like Flying Rhino who even didn’t show their prices for NF. And many many other questions. Let’s maintain the same level for everyone instead of focused on particular people?
Yes, and I’m only one council who asking detailed reports from grantees . By the way, some people from NF team thinks it’s not important.
|Briefly||Proposal||Created||Approved||Delay||Target wallet||Amount N||Report|
|Telegram||[APPROVED] Telegram Community Monthly Rewards||9/29/2021||Yes||nearlove.near||100||No|
|Near Punks||[APPROVED] NEAR Punks as Vietnamese Community Event Rewards||10/16/2021||Yes||nearlove.near||225||No|
|Near Mexico||[Approved] Near México November 2021 Activities||11/8/2021||Yes||josedlujan.near||190||No|
|Naksh||[Approved] Updated Marketing proposal for Naksh from Mid Nov till December||11/16/2021||Yes||naksh.near||400||No|
|Telegram AMA Ecosystem||[APPROVED] Telegram AMA with Ecosystem Projects||11/17/2021||Yes||nearlove.near||75||No|
No problems do it for councils verification. It’s the best way now.
Anyway, All community members should vote for this. I you or Grace cannot make decision without approval from Community.
Absolutely, and I think it’s fair to show a semblance of a human being when you are distributing such high levels of funds
As I said it should be public discussion and voting.
Should everyone use real names on the forum?
Should everyone use real photos on the forum?
Will you of NF insure security guarantees for contributors?
Should be kind of agreement between NF and contributors about personal data.
Now, when anybody asking some personal information it violates community guidelines.
Yes, KYC the best solution.