Hello @Dacha - please substantiate your comments here with evidence of those you are seeing who are providing ‘fake Twitter accounts’:
in either a separte Forum post or in a direct message to me if you prefer so these comments can be properly reviewed. And if you wish to continue reviewing monthly reward claims for the Open Web Sandbox, please let me know as well as we could always use the assistance, so that our community members can get the support they need and rewards for their work faster!
I would also like to address your comments about this particular Sandboxer/community member’s claim. Every open web contributor or community member brings value to the Sandbox and to the broader NEAR community by engaging positively and openly. Not everyone is a marketer, developer, or professional in any sense and that is not needed in order to participate in the OWS. The ask we have put out as a Guild and as a space for new community members to come learn about NEAR, is that they come learn and spread the word about NEAR. These rewards are offered not in exchange of professional services but to incentivize engagement - which is exactly what this community member did.
If you would like to propose alternative reward models or engagement structures, I would be very interested in reviewing them as this is a topic that is of concern to everyone in the community and gets discussed a lot. Let’s move the discussion to open, actionable proposals for what can be reasonably done better and to the inclusion and benefit of all instead of targeting individuals and their contributions.
And with your last comment here you are in danger of veering into bullying behaviour so I would prompt you to review this Implementing NEAR Community Guidelines post if you haven’t already.