Can rest of the @marketingdao-council review and share their feedback please?
Thanks!
Also happy to support
Thanks for support sir
Hoping @marketingdao-council will review our proposal , your feedback is value with us. Thank you for advance support team marketing
Hey @naveen_in – can you help me understand what the current request is for – your chart shows funding for March, April, May as received – what is the pending reward for those same months under June Adv Request? If you are requesting additional funding for past activities that have already been funding, can you explain the request? Thanks!
Hey @so608
Yes, this covers our previous months pending rewards($ 4082) along with the June Month Advance Request ($ 5350)
Previous Month Activities to be rewarded.
We are requesting for the additional funding of past activities because
We have already received the support of 2 Marketing DAO Councils.
Good day @marketingdao-council , we know that tagging you so much is quite irritating but can someone atleast attend NMD proposal. We really valued your feedback please.?
I’m glad to be back of this amazing community…NMD is amazing!
the second month is coming , as NMD admins are sitting without a salary )
Of course , we are crypto enthusiasts , but you can 't explain it to an Internet provider
Hi Naveen,
I am unable to support this proposal as we are basically paying for the same work twice.
The NEAR Foundation has implemented measures to prevent this situation from arising:
Once a project receives the funds, ensuring the money is used as intended is solely the responsibility of the project. This includes making the necessary swaps to hedge against volatility.
It would be irrational to expect the community fund to absorb any losses while not getting any benefits from capital appreciation. Covering these losses would deter people from doig what they are meant to (deploys USD equivalent of funds) to maximise personal gain and at maximum liability to the DAO.
Its not only salary will affects. All funding related for rewards will affects , even so all delaying related cost of NMD collaborations will affects too. Not only that but also in Astro dao funds. The more delay the more our funds will be less because of price fluctuation… i hope they can see that situation going in here.
Hi Councils (@so608 and @Klint)!
Thanks
Hi Naveen,
We’ve discussed this case during today’s Council meeting. We are willing to approve the proposal just for the June amount 5350. Unfortunately we are not able to proceed with the retroactive pay for pay differential.
Let us know if this is an acceptable offer so we can proceed.
Also be mindful that we are in the process of reviewing our criteria and process for distributing community funds. We are encouraging all projects to diversify on sources of revenue where possible.
We are ready to accept the proposed amount of June Month. Revising the proposal amount to 5350.
The proposal has been revised. Kindly reconsider it.
Moving this to approved – thanks for revising the proposal. You can submit to Astro.
Thanks @marketingdao-council
Astro DAO proposal:
https://app.astrodao.com/dao/marketing.sputnik-dao.near/proposals/marketing.sputnik-dao.near-399