Ok. Thank You. Going to approve it. Keep going to build your awesome community.
Ahaha, Dacha What about visiting Goa?
Itās a nice place to spend time
Thinking about it
After NEAR Beer, We have NEAR Chai Now
Hey,
Appreciate the enthusiasm, but I would like to see more clarity about each item which youāve requested funding for and how it relates to marketing.
To what end? How will funding this assist you in achieving success in marketing?
Iād like to see more details about the events. What is the goal of them? Expected turnout and impact?
I find it difficult to see the value in this from a marketing perspective.
That said, if you leveraged those images to produce further content around it and had a plan to publish that content to achieve marketing goals, then it might make sense.
There is no requirement to fulfill NEARās marketing goals. Thatās not what the MarketingDAO exists to fund, thereās an internal marketing department for that.
Iād generally advise to not consider that, to an extent.,
The goal of the MarketingDAO is to empower you, Guilds, individuals, and projects building on NEAR to achieve your marketing goals.
Iām not trying to get into the semantics of marketing, I just think there needs to be more clarity around each of your items in regards to how they relate to your marketing goals.
- What are you aiming to achieve?
- How does x help you achieve them?
- What metrics are you using to measure the success of x?
And thatās awesome, but define how the ART NEAR WORLD TRAVEL Guild fits into that, then define each of these for your itemised requests:
Hop hey la la ley going to be here
Let me give you an example:
Objectively, this is an image of someone with a flag that says āNEARā on it.
So:
Right now, Iād disagree. Because itās just a picture on a forum. Have you leveraged it elsewhere?
See:
Right, and thatās a great objective to have. However, in your proposal you did not share any of this.
Hence, there was no connection to having a photo of someone with a NEAR flag to a focus on Marketing.
Thatās not the case. I think you should generally structure proposals like this:
Most of the initiatives youāve proposed here donāt have this.
The MarketingDAO is not a decentralised marketing arm for NEAR Foundation or the NEAR Protocol.
So long as youāre building on or around NEAR, then the MarketingDAO exists to fund your marketing initiatives to help you achieve success. If that happens to overlap with what NEAR is focusing on then great. But itās not a requirement.
Please can u share which is NEAR marketing focus?
This shouldnāt really be a consideration when you submit a funding request to the MarketingDAO:
The MarketingDAO is not a decentralised marketing arm for NEAR Foundation or the NEAR Protocol.
There is no requirement to fulfill NEARās marketing goals. Thatās not what the MarketingDAO exists to fund, thereās an internal marketing department for that.
Iād generally advise to not consider that, to an extent.,
The goal of the MarketingDAO is to empower you, Guilds, individuals, and projects building on NEAR to achieve your marketing goals.
I meant you and your guild have many ways to get funded.
Instead of escalate conflict , Iām suggesting to work with Ecosystem DAO as a guild and use Marketing DAO for some activities.
Donāt see the promotional reach and use-case for this type of project. Itās a no from me.
A couple of thoughts:
- There are 13 different projects here with very little details about timeline, team involved, metrics, budget specifics. The MarketingDAO is here to support community projects, but they want to see detailed, clear proposals supported by high-quality content that will help grow the Near community.
- A way to improve this might be to propose 1 project to start so that the MarketingDAO can understand how you work, see what the result is and build confidence and trust in your work.
- In general, I advise the MarketingDAO not to fund projects that include significant operational, non-marketing costs such as lodging/housing, travel expenses, petrol. There are other guilds and DAOs that may be able to support those funding requests.
I am not a voting council member, but if I were, I would vote no on this and hope that you re-submit a proposal for 1 project with details outlined clearly, then report on that activity before submitting the next proposal.