NEAR House of Stake — Code of Conduct (CoC) draft for community review

Continued…

5. Evidence‑to‑Policy Mapping

Click to Expand: Evidence‑to‑Policy Mapping

Purpose

This table serves as a bridge between principles and practice—mapping each section of the House of Stake (HoS) Code of Conduct to:

  1. Governance framework dimensions (e.g. legitimacy, transparency, inclusion)

  2. Supporting research from institutional, academic, and Web3 sources

  3. Precedents from DAO, open-source, and community codes

The goal is to anchor HoS provisions in auditable sources of legitimacy—ensuring each clause is not only normatively grounded, but also pragmatically defensible and informed by ecosystem-wide learning.

This is especially vital in the NEAR ecosystem, where governance innovation must balance on-chain decentralization, off-chain community values, and institutional trustworthiness.

CoC Section Framework Dimension(s) Supporting Research / Evidence DAO / Community Precedent
Methodology & Evidence Base Legitimacy & Transparency. Transparent, reasoned deliberation legitimizes policy. UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025b] Arbitrum DAO, 2023; Uniswap DAO, 2023; Contributor Covenant, 2023
Purpose & Values Legitimacy, Representation & Inclusivity. Establishes normative baseline. NEAR Core, 2021; Mozilla Foundation, 2021; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] Contributor Covenant, 2023; Uniswap DAO, 2023; Arbitrum DAO, 2023
Scope Modularity & Subsidiarity; Representation. Boundaries enable scaling. UNESCO, 2023 NDC Transparency Commission, 2023; Django, 2023; Scroll, 2023
Definitions Transparency & Accountability. Clarifies roles and scope. UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025b] Contributor Covenant, 2023; Django, 2023; NDC Transparency Commission, 2023
agreed Behaviors Representation & Inclusivity; Education. Encourages norms. Mozilla Foundation, 2021; NEAR Core, 2021; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] Contributor Covenant, 2023; ZKsync, 2023
Unacceptable Behaviors Accountability & Enforcement. Establishes guardrails. CIGI, 2021; UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] Optimism, 2023; Creative Commons, 2020; Uniswap DAO, 2023
Reporting Channels Transparency & Accessibility. Trust depends on access. Django, 2023; UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] Contributor Covenant, 2023; Django, 2023
Intake & Triage Accountability & Procedural Justice. Predictable flow. Django, 2023 Django, 2023; Rare in DAOs
moderation standards Procedural Justice & Representation. Fair handling. UNESCO, 2023; Schneider, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] Django, 2023; Optimism, 2023
Sanctions Ladder Proportionality & Restorative Justice. Tiered consequences. Contributor Covenant, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] ZKsync, 2023; Arbitrum DAO, 2023
Appeals & Review Legitimacy & Accountability. Enables correction. UNESCO, 2023; Schneider, 2023 Django, 2023; Optimism, 2023
Anti-Retaliation Protection & Inclusivity. Enables safe reporting. UNESCO, 2023 Contributor Covenant, 2023; NEAR Core, 2021
Accessibility & Inclusion Inclusivity & Education. Translation, onboarding. UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025a] ZKsync, 2023; NEAR Foundation, 2023
Cultural & Jurisdictional Awareness Subsidiarity & Cultural Competence. Local variance. UNESCO, 2023 Creative Commons, 2020
Power Imbalances & Conflict of Interest Equity & Accountability. COI disclosures. OECD, 2014; Schneider, 2023 Arbitrum DAO, 2023; Scroll, 2023
Data Protection & Privacy Privacy & Trust. Protects individuals. UNESCO, 2023; [Hack Humanity, 2025b] Uniswap DAO, 2023; NEAR Foundation, 2023
Education & Onboarding Education & Improvement. Tools and learning. UNESCO, 2023; Schneider, 2023 ZKsync, 2023; Django, 2023
Transparency & Reporting Accountability & Transparency. Public data. UNESCO, 2023 Optimism, 2023; Creative Commons, 2020
Governance & Amendments Legitimacy & Modularity. Rules for change. UNESCO, 2023; Schneider, 2023; Tan et al., 2024 Uniswap DAO, 2023; Arbitrum DAO, 2023; Django, 2023
Interoperability Modularity & Portability. Cross-project synergy. Schneider, 2023; UNESCO, 2023 Scroll, 2023; Creative Commons, 2020
Versioning & Changelog Transparency & Improvement. History of change. UNESCO, 2023 Contributor Covenant, 2023; Django, 2023
AI Ethics & Agent Regulation Accountability & Fairness. AI explainability, oversight. Gabriel, 2020; Transcend, 2023 Pioneered in HoS; few DAO precedents

Conclusion: Insights from the Mapping

Top-Level Insight
The HoS Code of Conduct is well-aligned with global governance standards, drawing from both institutional rigor and DAO-native practices.

Key Takeaways

  • Most CoCs lack procedural depth—HoS adds missing layers: moderation standards, triage, appeals, changelogs.

  • HoS is one of the few frameworks to explicitly integrate AI governance, informed by academic and civic literature.

  • The use of modular, interoperable, and ratifiable design patterns reflects best-in-class institutional + Web3 synthesis.

Strategic Opportunity
HoS can position itself not just as a NEAR-specific standard, but as a model governance instrument for decentralized, community-led systems—setting a precedent for legitimacy, accountability, and evolution-by-design.

References for Evidence‑to‑Policy Mapping

References

Arbitrum DAO. (2023). Arbitrum DAO code of conduct. Arbitrum Foundation Forum. https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/the-arbitrum-dao-code-of-conduct/29713

Centre for International Governance Innovation. (2021). Algorithms and the control of speech: How platform governance is failing under the weight of AI. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/algorithmic-content-moderation-brings-new-opportunities-and-risks/

Contributor Covenant. (2023). Contributor Covenant: A code of conduct for open source projects (Version 3.0). https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/3/0/code_of_conduct/

Creative Commons. (2020). Creative Commons code of conduct. https://creativecommons.org/code-of-conduct/

Django Software Foundation. (2023). Django community code of conduct: Enforcement manual. https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/

Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds and Machines, 30(3), 411–437. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2

Hack Humanity. (2025a). Hack Humanity governance hackathon code of conduct. Personal communication, August 18, 2025.

Hack Humanity. (2025b). ArbGovHack terms & conditions. Personal communication, August 18, 2025.

Mozilla Foundation. (2021). Mozilla community participation guidelines. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/participation/

NEAR Core. (2021). Community etiquette. NEAR Governance Forum. https://gov.near.org/t/community-etiquette/4417

NEAR Foundation. (2023). Community guidelines. NEAR Governance Forum. https://gov.near.org/t/community-guidelines/5

NDC Transparency Commission. (2023). NDC code of conduct by transparency commission. NEAR Governance Forum. https://gov.near.org/t/ndc-code-of-conduct-by-transparency-commission/36780

OECD. (2014). Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies. OECD Publishing. OECD Legal Instruments

Optimism Collective. (2023). Code of conduct. Optimism Governance Forum. https://gov.optimism.io/t/code-of-conduct/5751

Schneider, N. (2023). Governable spaces: Democratic design for online communities. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520393950/governable-spaces

Scroll Foundation. (2023). Delegate & voter code of conduct. https://scroll.io/gov-docs/content/delegate-voter-code-of-conduct

Tan, J., Angeris, G., Chitra, T., & Karger, D. (2024). Constitutions of Web3: A comparative study of DAO governance documents. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.00081

Transcend. (2023). Key principles for ethical AI development. https://transcend.io/blog/ai-ethics

UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339

Uniswap DAO. (2023). RFC: Delegate code of conduct. Uniswap Governance Forum. https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-delegate-code-of-conduct/20913

ZKsync Association. (2023). ZK Nation code of conduct. https://docs.zknation.io/zk-nation-community/zk-nation-code-of-conduct

1 Like