# Injustice and double standards of Globe DAO **URL:** https://gov.near.org/t/injustice-and-double-standards-of-globe-dao/39529 **Category:** Globe DAO **Created:** [June 3, 2024, 1:34pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/injustice-and-double-standards-of-globe-dao/39529 "2024-06-03T13:34:19Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 3
### Author: ![MostafaLotfy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@MostafaLotfy](https://gov.near.org/u/MostafaLotfy) #### Post date: [June 13, 2024, 10:14am UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/injustice-and-double-standards-of-globe-dao/39529/3 "2024-06-13T10:14:35Z")
To be honest, I expected a stronger response from you, but as usual it was a very weak response and you couldn’t even prove anything contrary to what was mentioned in the topic. > [@iamanansari](#): > > Most of these allegations are regarding wallets having no transactions. I would request that you read the [Charter](https://docs.google.com/document/d/18IT-gAAIgnXRB7uWHseze73uezv1Gc-E_g76YrFejEQ/edit?usp=sharing) once again. We never said that every new wallet must be active and must have a lot of transactions. The KPI was to onboard new wallets, and the retention rate should be around 30–35%. I hope you get the point here. This is a serious admission from you, as you admit that Globe DAO does not mind onboard new wallets with zero transactions and does not even do IAH, although in this case the wallets are useless and bots, and this is not my personal opinion, but I think that any “Not biased” person would have the same opinion Like: > [@\[REPORT\] NEAR Pakistan Community March Report](http://gov.near.org/t/report-near-pakistan-community-march-report/38722/3): > > [70 New NEAR Wallet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_iAlw5ncergwCH02tS5hDTRhmmV2taXX/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=112895862895814904657&rtpof=true&sd=true) Creations (15 needed) —\> I’m sorry but 99% didin’t make any TX, this can’t be count as “real” wallet Also, your words are evidence that you have “Double Standards” as you say that it is mentioned in the Charter that the KPI is just “Onboard” new wallets **without any conditions.** So why did you apply a “condition of your own making” when it comes to NEAR Arabic? you said that most of the wallets were created at the same time and didn’t fund us. But when it comes to other communities that have zero transaction wallets and most of them were created at the same time, you funding them! > [@iamanansari](#): > > Regarding Near Ukraine’s partnership: As we all know, the current scenario in Ukraine is devastating, and it’s very hard for them to search for any partner companies. Still, they are trying hard. Due to this, their budget is always lower as compared to other Tier C communities. Instead of this partnership, they do some additional events. From June, they will bring one partnership (as they wrote in their June proposal), and we have granted the community in Tier B. They didn’t do any partnerships, so why were they funded? You say they did “additional events”, In April, NEAR Ukraine was under tier C According to the Charter, NEAR Ukraine should do 2 events (with at least 20 participants) + 1 developer event. NEAR Ukraine only did 2 events + 1 developer event in April! Where are the additional events you mentioned? Even if they did, there is no text in the Charter that says “we will pay you if you do additional events instead of partnership”. Also, as is clear to everyone [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bFtdI75ciaSDQeqVRlqEPixn39U-nzbyK8DCwlDroaM/edit#heading=h.unp0buqab2e1), the second event only had 13 participants! However, the funding was approved! You Ignored many facts that I have pointed out in the topic and this is conclusive evidence that you have no response and cannot prove otherwise. Some facts such as: - NEAR Ukraine and NPV Twitter accounts are in English although in Charter all accounts should be in the local language. - The wallets did not make IAH - NEAR Ukraine did not achieve 50 active telegram members. - NEAR Turkey supposed to achieve 20 transactions for at least 25 wallets to get the fund, but only 10 wallets were achieved. - The article published by NEAR Positive Vibes is just a copy and paste And many other facts, knowing that this is only for April! I have attached all the facts with evidence and I repeat this only for the month of April, and if I investigate for the other months I may find many things worth reviewing. I will stop there, any “unbiased” person who cares about applying justice in NEAR and that everyone gets his right to apply the principle of justice and transparency can review the subject or he can investigate himself and he will find many mistakes and he will find huge amounts of money that were spent on certain people and communities without justification. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.near.org/t/injustice-and-double-standards-of-globe-dao/39529)._