# HSP-010: NEAR House of Stake Screening Committee Charter

**URL:** <https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-010-near-house-of-stake-screening-committee-charter/42020>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Tags:** hackhumanity\
**Created:** [January 29, 2026, 6:31pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-010-near-house-of-stake-screening-committee-charter/42020 "2026-01-29T18:31:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![coffee-crusher](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/gov.near.org/coffee-crusher/32/54215_2.png) [@coffee-crusher](https://gov.near.org/u/coffee-crusher)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2026, 10:23pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-010-near-house-of-stake-screening-committee-charter/42020/3 "2026-01-30T22:23:08Z")

</div>

Thank you so much to the @HackHumanity team for the detailed work on this Charter. I support the move to an appointment based model for the interim period, as it’s a pragmatic step to ensure operational readiness and avoid complexity.

While the Constitution establishes our high level governance principles, this Charter serves as the operational ‘how to’ for the committee’s day-to-day work. For that reason, I believe this Charter must explicitly mandate a Public Determination Report for all committee routing and classification decisions to ensure our framework is built on a foundation of absolute transparency.

Some thoughts and feedback:

1. The Charter currently notes that the Committee “shall publish rationale” for its decisions, and should be formalized into a Public Determination Report whenever a proposal is reclassified (i.e. moved to a Supermajority proposal vote), routed differently, or rejected. Consistent with my [feedback](https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-xxx-near-house-of-stake-constitution/42018/3) on the Constitution proposal, a standardized 7 day window for this report would provide the procedural clarity delegates need to understand the committee’s logic.

2. I appreciate the Committee’s role in internal coordination for interpretation disputes. These interpretations should be documented within the aforementioned reports. This ensures that the committee’s decision-making creates a predictable and transparent precedent.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-010-near-house-of-stake-screening-committee-charter/42020)._
