Thank you so much to the @HackHumanity team for the detailed work on this Charter. I support the move to an appointment based model for the interim period, as it’s a pragmatic step to ensure operational readiness and avoid complexity.
While the Constitution establishes our high level governance principles, this Charter serves as the operational ‘how to’ for the committee’s day-to-day work. For that reason, I believe this Charter must explicitly mandate a Public Determination Report for all committee routing and classification decisions to ensure our framework is built on a foundation of absolute transparency.
Some thoughts and feedback:
-
The Charter currently notes that the Committee “shall publish rationale” for its decisions, and should be formalized into a Public Determination Report whenever a proposal is reclassified (i.e. moved to a Supermajority proposal vote), routed differently, or rejected. Consistent with my feedback on the Constitution proposal, a standardized 7 day window for this report would provide the procedural clarity delegates need to understand the committee’s logic.
-
I appreciate the Committee’s role in internal coordination for interpretation disputes. These interpretations should be documented within the aforementioned reports. This ensures that the committee’s decision-making creates a predictable and transparent precedent.