# GWG July Funding Request **URL:** \ **Category:** NDC\ **Tags:** community, funding, proposals, ndc, ndc-funding-request\ **Created:** [August 8, 2023, 6:12pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/gwg-july-funding-request/35736 "2023-08-08T18:12:48Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![Mayor\_of\_Pumpopolis](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/gov.near.org/mayor_of_pumpopolis/32/47820_2.png) [@Mayor\_of\_Pumpopolis](https://gov.near.org/u/Mayor_of_Pumpopolis)\ **Post date:** [August 13, 2023, 8:04am UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/gwg-july-funding-request/35736/7 "2023-08-13T08:04:02Z")
There’s no tangible value here. I’m sure insiders will disagree. NEAR would be at an ATH if meetings, PDFs and fluff were doing something for the ecosystem. You can use as many buzzwords as you like, at the end of the day the community needs to see results. Whatever the GWG is, it isn’t getting us there. Time for accountability and a fresh approach. > [@GWG June Funding Request](http://gov.near.org/t/gwg-june-funding-request/35285/4): > > Really don’t see the value in any of this. Who is the customer here? How does this help the ecosystem acquire customers? At this point NF could have spent the 150k on giving each new user a dollar as a bounty for staying active in dapps, and spent another $9USD per user fighting fraud. 15k active users would be more valuable any of the nebulous, intangible nonsense listed here. There’s no orientation towards business or a profit motive. Would rather see the money going towards users than what… --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.near.org/t/gwg-july-funding-request/35736)._