I am a real person, a Degen, and member of a second guild. I have been active in the Degen group for a few months now- You can check my wallet, I make the same base amount that I assume most other degens make.
Hey dude. I understand the alarm if you weren’t familiar with the initiative. Here’s the form we’ve been reposting regularly to recruit people. This should give you an idea of what’s up. https://forms.gle/yrvJ8yjB7jNSc4MN7
And I think you are underestimating how familiar community members may be with the program.
@Grace Good morning. I saw you approved the proposal. Could you please share your thoughts? why? Do you support shipposting? Why you didn’t ask any reports?
Thanks for your diligent work and dedication to ensure effective allocation of $NEAR.
I am in full support of the work of the NEAR army, as I am in full support of the work of the Guilds that @Ozymandius manages and any other activity that aligns efforts to increase ecosystem value.
As I see you are spending valuable time in this forum, I welcome your time and support to become a council member in any of these treasuries.
As for my personal use of NEAR, that is what it is: PERSONAL. If you have an evidence-based accusation, please share it.
I’m not surprised, you work together and support each other. It’s the reason why consuls should be independent persons. @Grace grace did you read the topic The Marketing DAO Vertical - #14 by Dacha how should be prepared funding request? Or you both don’t care about it?
And you didn’t say about interplanetary.near .
Thanks
Hello Dacha, I see you’re up to something, demanding more outcome reports and questioning payment approvals. Well, there is nothing wrong with it. And I believe every member of community member has right to ask it.
But what I’m also observing that You’re accusing people on assumptions and using a harsh language-which is not right!(correct me if I’m wrong on this)
Hey @Dacha , I appreciate your initial question around what are the goals and results of this effort.
But I would like to highlight that since it you went into attacking people and trolling which is beyond what should be happening in the forum and NEAR community overall.
I have posted more Community Etiquette with what code of conduct really comes out of our values. Please read it carefully.
Instead of inflammatory inquiry, a reasonable question to provide more transparency is a way to go. Please follow these guidelines, or we would need to suspend your account. Personal attacks will never lead to a constrictive dialogue.
Returning to the original question - it is still not answered here, so that’s still in order in a reasonable form: goals of the effort, KPIs, learnings, next iteration that improves on things that didn’t work.
(1) In the replies, @ozymandius offered to answer all your questions. Even through a public call. Even messaged you separately to answer you. You ignored.
(2) At the time of your initial inquiry, we had to do two things at once:
follow procedure and post funding info on forum publicly
but also keep our operations opaque, as that was requested of us
Sure, you didn’t know this before, so you would have been suspicious. But now you do know, because (as in the linked reply), I have explained to you. And so did @Ozymandius, in his post.
(3) Then you blow things out of proportion and start ridiculing + accusing people based on your unfounded narrative.
So we finally think enough is enough and give you the full backstory + as much relevant insight as possible.
Now that everything is out in daylight, if we want to move the conversation to what actually matters (“goals of effort, KPIs, learning, next iteration…”), then we can. But even with this @Dacha seems to be unwilling to have fruitful conversation, because they merely comment “it doesn’t matter” or “remove the scalpers”. How do we move to have a conversation when even being given what they demanded, they can’t engage in a constructive manner? Dialogue requires the effort of both parties.