# \[CLOSED\] First Proposal Limoeiro DAO / AUGUST 2022 **URL:** \ **Category:** Creatives DAO\ **Tags:** creatives-dao\ **Created:** [August 3, 2022, 5:15pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/closed-first-proposal-limoeiro-dao-august-2022/26230 "2022-08-03T17:15:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 38
**Author:** ![whoiscavenaghi](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/gov.near.org/whoiscavenaghi/32/6410_2.png) [@whoiscavenaghi](https://gov.near.org/u/whoiscavenaghi)\ **Post date:** [August 10, 2022, 8:09pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/closed-first-proposal-limoeiro-dao-august-2022/26230/38 "2022-08-10T20:09:08Z")
I think that’s pretty much what I think too @frnvpr . And one of the points was : the possibility of those DAOS become council of Creatives. > [@Cryptonaut](#): > > Decentralisation - This could lead to all 4 DAOs becoming part of the Creatives DAO council creating a cohortof centralized voting power. This go far away from the capacity, or if the DAOS are community or projects. As long several DAOS are part of big community- in the case Brasil - this will happen. Supporting each other. We aren’t here to win in the votes of Creatives DAO. - other point, any chance of new councils making part of Limoeiro? The unique constructive review is “allocate” the project to another DAO? Passing through the philosophy of the project and everything? Well it seems I will leave this here… [Etiquette](http://gov.near.org/t/community-etiquette/4417) Thank you @blusw for your response. Mostly of we are here a long time and know the work of each other. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.near.org/t/closed-first-proposal-limoeiro-dao-august-2022/26230)._