# \[Approved by HoM\] AC-DAO: NDC V1 MAR Budget Application Version 2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Aurora Community DAO\ **Tags:** community, daos, proposals, aurora, ndc\ **Created:** [February 26, 2024, 10:03pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/approved-by-hom-ac-dao-ndc-v1-mar-budget-application-version-2/38205 "2024-02-26T22:03:16Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 5
**Author:** ![chloe](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/gov.near.org/chloe/32/533_2.png) [@chloe](https://gov.near.org/u/chloe)\ **Post date:** [February 29, 2024, 1:22pm UTC](https://gov.near.org/t/approved-by-hom-ac-dao-ndc-v1-mar-budget-application-version-2/38205/5 "2024-02-29T13:22:22Z")
> [@AuroraCommunityDAO](#): > > Gaming Retention And Growth Grant - PipeFlare [Link](http://gov.near.org/t/march-gaming-retention-and-growth-grant-pipeflare/38047) $4,500.00 Just curious, is there a reason for there being two pipeflair proposals instead of both bring in the same proposal concerning "gaming retention and growth”?. Seems like everything in the proposal for building out a new game would be included in the theme of gaming retention and growth? Also, it’s very difficult to evaluate proposals for which there are no links. There’s also a note from January asking for links to be added previously? > [@AC-DAO mini grant program (February)](http://gov.near.org/t/ac-dao-mini-grant-program-february/37777/2): > > We are very happy to welcome you to the forum. AC-DAO will definitely support your initiative with great pleasure. If possible, please try to edit the post and add links. Thank you and stay in touch Also just general, is there a reason that funding for December is being asked for now? I see the note for it the budget line item, but I don’t see additional details for why or a report for December attached. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.near.org/t/approved-by-hom-ac-dao-ndc-v1-mar-budget-application-version-2/38205)._