Thank you for your comments on our proposal.
For questions 1, & 2, I will attach the links to our reports for all 3 of our approved N@N proposals where we have outlined important statistics such as views, new followers & impressions to measure the impact of N@N.
For question 3 & 4, we believe that N@N should be a free experience for projects in order to maximize exposure for all founders and teams looking to build on NEAR. Charging for AMAs would hinder the exposure and growth that projects desperately need at an early stage of development.
Charging for AMAs would also completely change the environment of the show and remove the organic feel and natural discussion that is the hallmark of NEAR at NIGHT. While we continue to ask for funding from the Marketing DAO, we feel that the hard work of the N@N team has provided clear value for the NEAR ecosystem during an important stage in NEAR protocols growth.
At this point in time, we do not have plans for self-sufficiency for the reasons above, but are open to suggestions/ideas from the Marketing DAO council.
Near at Night has received 3 grants in total for 5 months and a total of 80 spaces show, with each show averaging ~1.3 hours in length.
Proposal 1: $4,134.40
Proposal 2: $4,424
Proposal 3: $12384